Publication:
Pediatric elbow measurement parameters: Evaluation of the six angles in inter- and intra-observer reliability

dc.contributor.authorPurinon Suangyanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrnusa Chalayonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKitti Worawuthangkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamolporn Kaewpornsawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanase Ariyawatkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerajit Eamsobhanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:41:51Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:41:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Background: Several radiographic measurements of the humerus can be used to evaluate the treatment outcome of supracondylar fractures in children. Because of the cartilaginous nature of the immature elbow, interpretation of radiographs around this area is sometimes challenging and can be unreliable. This study was conducted to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the six commonly used radiographic measurements of the distal humerus. Method: The Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle and lateral capitellohumeral angle of the humerus were measured by two observers on the radiographs of uninjured elbows from 58 children. The values between each measurement were compared and correlated using a Pearson coefficient of correlation to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. Results: All of the radiographic parameters showed excellent intra-observer reliability with the correlation coefficient values of the Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, lateral capitellohumeral angle as 0.945, 0.95, 0.909, 0.888, 0.961 and 0.975 (p < 0.001), respectively. The inter-observer reliability of the Baumann and humero-ulna angles were also found to be highly correlated at r = 0.843 (p < 0.001) and 0.878 (p < 0.001), respectively. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle had poor reliability with r = 0.136 (p = 0.291) while the radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, and lateral capitellohumeral angle demonstrated good reliability with r = 0.675 (p < 0.001), 0.747 (p < 0.001), and 0.686 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The Baumann angle and humero-ulna angle measurements of distal humerus showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. Both parameters represent repeatable and reliable methods for determining the outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric population.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. Vol.10, No.4 (2019), 792-796en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.019en_US
dc.identifier.issn22133445en_US
dc.identifier.issn09765662en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85050689907en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51554
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050689907&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePediatric elbow measurement parameters: Evaluation of the six angles in inter- and intra-observer reliabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050689907&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections