Publication: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of using 0.01% versus 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: A randomized, double-blind, split-face, comparative study
dc.contributor.author | Poonkiat Suchonwanit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sarawin Harnchoowong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nongsak Chanasumon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tueboon Sriphojanart | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-27T10:21:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-27T10:21:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Background: Previous studies have proven the efficacy and safety of 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis; however, there is no comparison study between both concentrations. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. Patients/Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study was conducted in 30 patients with eyebrow hypotrichosis. Each side of eyebrow of individual patients was randomly assigned for 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost, applied on each eyebrow once daily. Eyebrow density, diameter, the Global Eyebrow Assessment scale, 7-point rating scale, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Side effects were also recorded. Results: Both 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost significantly improved eyebrow density and diameter (P <.05), although there were no statistically significant differences in changes in eyebrow density and diameter from baseline between both concentrations (P =.96 and.84, respectively). Additionally, patients significantly preferred 0.03% bimatoprost in terms of clinical improvement and satisfaction (P =.04 and.003, respectively). Conclusions: Both 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost are effective and safe for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. Bimatoprost 0.03% is superior to its 0.01% counterpart, albeit without statistical significance. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. (2019) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jocd.13079 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14732165 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14732130 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85069651770 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52100 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069651770&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of using 0.01% versus 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: A randomized, double-blind, split-face, comparative study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069651770&origin=inward | en_US |