Publication:
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of using 0.01% versus 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: A randomized, double-blind, split-face, comparative study

dc.contributor.authorPoonkiat Suchonwaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorSarawin Harnchoowongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNongsak Chanasumonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTueboon Sriphojanarten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:21:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:21:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Background: Previous studies have proven the efficacy and safety of 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis; however, there is no comparison study between both concentrations. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. Patients/Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical study was conducted in 30 patients with eyebrow hypotrichosis. Each side of eyebrow of individual patients was randomly assigned for 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost, applied on each eyebrow once daily. Eyebrow density, diameter, the Global Eyebrow Assessment scale, 7-point rating scale, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Side effects were also recorded. Results: Both 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost significantly improved eyebrow density and diameter (P <.05), although there were no statistically significant differences in changes in eyebrow density and diameter from baseline between both concentrations (P =.96 and.84, respectively). Additionally, patients significantly preferred 0.03% bimatoprost in terms of clinical improvement and satisfaction (P =.04 and.003, respectively). Conclusions: Both 0.01% and 0.03% bimatoprost are effective and safe for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis. Bimatoprost 0.03% is superior to its 0.01% counterpart, albeit without statistical significance.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology. (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.13079en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732165en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732130en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85069651770en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52100
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069651770&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy and safety of using 0.01% versus 0.03% bimatoprost for the treatment of eyebrow hypotrichosis: A randomized, double-blind, split-face, comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069651770&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections