Publication:
Clinical and methodological factors affecting non-transferrin-bound iron values using a novel fluorescent bead assay

dc.contributor.authorMaciej W. Garbowskien_US
dc.contributor.authorYongmin Maen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthat Fucharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomdet Srichairatanakoolen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert Hideren_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn B. Porteren_US
dc.contributor.otherUCLen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing's College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherZhejiang Chinese Medical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Institute of Science and Technology for Research and Development, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:20:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:00Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:20:25Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 The Authors Nontransferrin-bound iron (NTBI) is a heterogeneously speciated plasma iron, typically detectable when transferrin saturation (TfSat) exceeds 75%. Here, we examine factors affecting NTBI levels by a recently discovered direct chelator-based (CP851) fluorescent bead-linked flow-cytometric assay (bead-NTBI), compared with the established indirect nitrilotriacetate (NTA) assay in 122 iron-overloaded patients, including 64 on recent iron chelation therapy and 13 healthy volunteers. Both methods correlated (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001) but with low agreement, attributable to 2 major factors: (1) the NTA method, unlike the bead method, is highly dependent on TfSat, with NTBI under-estimation at low TfSat and over-estimation once Tf is saturated, (2) the bead method detects <3-fold higher values than the NTA assay in patients on recent deferiprone-containing chelation due to greater detection of chelate complexes but lower values for patients on deferasirox. The optimal timing of sample collection relative to chelation dosing requires further study. Patients with splenectomy, high-storage iron, and increased erythropoiesis had greater discrepancy between assays, consistent with differential access by both methods to the NTBI pools associated with these clinical variables. The bead-NTBI assay has advantages over the NTA assay, being less dependent on TfSat, hence of less tendency for false-negative or false-positive values at low and high TfSat, respectively.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTranslational Research. Vol.177, (2016), 19-30.e5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trsl.2016.05.005en_US
dc.identifier.issn18781810en_US
dc.identifier.issn19315244en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84979681515en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41061
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979681515&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleClinical and methodological factors affecting non-transferrin-bound iron values using a novel fluorescent bead assayen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979681515&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections