Publication:
Heterogeneity of Effect of Net Ultrafiltration Rate among Critically Ill Adults Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

dc.contributor.authorAry Serpa Netoen_US
dc.contributor.authorThummaporn Naorungrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaghavan Muruganen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn A. Kellumen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin Gallagheren_US
dc.contributor.authorRinaldo Bellomoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherGeorge Institute for Global Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Israelita Albert Einsteinen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustin Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:13:26Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:13:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)-treated patients, a net ultrafiltration (NUF) rate >1.75 mL/kg/h has been associated with increased mortality. However, there may be heterogeneity of effect of NUF rate on mortality, according to patient characteristics. Methods: To investigate the presence and impact of heterogeneity of effect, we performed a secondary analysis of the "Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level of Renal Replacement Therapy"(RENAL) trial. Exposure was NUF rate (weight-adjusted fluid volume removed per hour) stratified into tertiles (<1.01 mL/kg/h; 1.01-1.75 mL/kg/h; or >1.75 mL/kg/h). Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Patients were clustered according to baseline characteristics. Heterogeneity of effect was assessed according to clusters and baseline edema and related to the additional impact of baseline cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We excluded patients with missing values for baseline weight and/or treatment duration. Results: We identified 2 clusters. The largest (cluster 1; n = 941) included more severely ill patients, with more sepsis, more edema, and more vasopressor therapy (all p < 0.001). Compared to the middle tertile, the probability of harm was greater with the high tertile of NUF rate in patients in cluster 1 and in patients with baseline edema (probability of harm, cluster 1: 99.9%; edema: 99.1%). Moreover, higher baseline cardiovascular SOFA score also increased mortality risk with both high and low compared to middle NUF rates in cluster 1 patients and in patients with edema. Conclusions: In CRRT patients, both high and low NUF rates may be harmful, especially in those with edema, sepsis, and greater illness severity. Cardiovascular SOFA scores modulate this association. Additional studies are needed to test these hypotheses, and targeted trials of NUF rates based on risk stratification appear justified. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00221013.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBlood Purification. Vol.50, No.3 (2021), 336-346en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000510556en_US
dc.identifier.issn14219735en_US
dc.identifier.issn02535068en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85092793304en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78885
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092793304&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHeterogeneity of Effect of Net Ultrafiltration Rate among Critically Ill Adults Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092793304&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections