Publication: A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections
Issued Date
2014-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10566163
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84897115389
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Implant Dentistry. Vol.23, No.2 (2014), 206-211
Suggested Citation
Pattapon Asvanund A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections. Implant Dentistry. Vol.23, No.2 (2014), 206-211. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000063 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/33767
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study compared the load transfer characteristics of a complete-arch restoration supported by 4 implants, with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Three loading positions were applied to the prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epoxy resin models were used to simulate bone. Two types of implants (ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants and ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants) were placed in the models. Complete-arch metal frameworks were constructed on the abutments. Artificial teeth were arranged on the framework, and the prosthesis was screwed onto the abutments. The strain gauges were bonded at the implant-abutment connection level of the specimens with 3 loading conditions (a) 4-point load, (b) 2-point anterior load, and (c) 2-point lateral load. The reading of strain values were recorded and compared. RESULTS: In all load conditions, there were strain differences between the external implant-abutment connection and internal implant-abutment connection. The internal implant-abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level. CONCLUSION: When loaded vertically, the internal implant-abutment connection produced less strain when compared with the external implant-abutment connection. Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
