Publication:
Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza

dc.contributor.authorYeming Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu Zhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlex Salamen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoel Tarningen_US
dc.contributor.authorQingyuan Zhanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJian an Huangen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeng Wengen_US
dc.contributor.authorChangqing Baien_US
dc.contributor.authorYanhong Renen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoichi Yamadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDayan Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorQiang Guoen_US
dc.contributor.authorQiongqiong Fangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSakurai Tsutomuen_US
dc.contributor.authorXiaohui Zouen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaibo Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorAnnelies Gillesenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLyndsey Castleen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHongyan Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorJing Zhenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBinghuai Luen_US
dc.contributor.authorJun Duanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiping Guoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJinfang Jiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiyuan Caoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuohui Fanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJintong Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorFrederick G. Haydenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Horbyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBin Caoen_US
dc.contributor.otherChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChina PLA General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFujian Provincial Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherBeijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherChinese Center for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Virginia School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherCapital Medical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherToyama Chemical Co., Ltd.en_US
dc.contributor.otherChina-Japan Friendship Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherHQ Bioscience Co., Ltd.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T04:02:22Z
dc.date.available2020-12-28T04:02:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors Background: The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19. Methods: In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir Ctrough decreased significantly over time in both groups (p <0.01). Relative to day 2 (48 hrs), concentrations were 91.7% and 90.3% lower in the 1600/600 mg group and 79.3% and 89.5% lower in the 1800/800 mg group at day 7 and 10, respectively. In contrast, oseltamivir concentrations did not change significantly over time. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination described the observed favipiravir concentration-time data well. Modeling demonstrated that less than 50% of patients achieved Ctrough ≥20 mg/L for >80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza. Conclusion: The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEBioMedicine. Vol.62, (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103125en_US
dc.identifier.issn23523964en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85096699162en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60392
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096699162&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titlePhase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenzaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096699162&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections