Publication: Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza
dc.contributor.author | Yeming Wang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wu Zhong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Alex Salam | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Joel Tarning | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Qingyuan Zhan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jian an Huang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Heng Weng | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Changqing Bai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yanhong Ren | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koichi Yamada | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dayan Wang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Qiang Guo | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Qiongqiong Fang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sakurai Tsutomu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Xiaohui Zou | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Haibo Li | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Annelies Gillesen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lyndsey Castle | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng Chen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hongyan Li | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jing Zhen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Binghuai Lu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jun Duan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liping Guo | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jinfang Jiang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiyuan Cao | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Guohui Fan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jintong Li | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Frederick G. Hayden | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen Wang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Peter Horby | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bin Cao | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | China PLA General Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Fujian Provincial Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | University of Virginia School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Capital Medical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | China-Japan Friendship Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Nuffield Department of Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | HQ Bioscience Co., Ltd. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-28T04:02:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-28T04:02:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2020 The Authors Background: The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19. Methods: In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir Ctrough decreased significantly over time in both groups (p <0.01). Relative to day 2 (48 hrs), concentrations were 91.7% and 90.3% lower in the 1600/600 mg group and 79.3% and 89.5% lower in the 1800/800 mg group at day 7 and 10, respectively. In contrast, oseltamivir concentrations did not change significantly over time. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination described the observed favipiravir concentration-time data well. Modeling demonstrated that less than 50% of patients achieved Ctrough ≥20 mg/L for >80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza. Conclusion: The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | EBioMedicine. Vol.62, (2020) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103125 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 23523964 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85096699162 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60392 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096699162&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.title | Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096699162&origin=inward | en_US |