Publication: Comparison of Tibial and Talar Bone Density in Patients Undergoing Total Ankle Replacement vs Non–Ankle Arthritis Matched Controls
1
item.page.dc.date.issued
2019-12-01
item.page.dc.type
item.page.dc.identifier.issn
19447876
10711007
10711007
item.page.dc.identifier.doi
item.page.dc.identifier.other
2-s2.0-85071501429
item.page.dc.rights
Mahidol University
item.page.dc.rights.holder
SCOPUS
item.page.dc.identifier.citation
Foot and Ankle International. Vol.40, No.12 (2019), 1408-1415
punsarn.item.page.citation
Thos Harnroongroj, Lauren G. Volpert, Scott J. Ellis, Carolyn M. Sofka, Jonathan T. Deland, Constantine A. Demetracopoulos Comparison of Tibial and Talar Bone Density in Patients Undergoing Total Ankle Replacement vs Non–Ankle Arthritis Matched Controls. Foot and Ankle International. Vol.40, No.12 (2019), 1408-1415. doi:10.1177/1071100719868496 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51269
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
relationships.isThesisOf
item.page.dc.title
Comparison of Tibial and Talar Bone Density in Patients Undergoing Total Ankle Replacement vs Non–Ankle Arthritis Matched Controls
item.page.dc.contributor.author
item.page.dc.contributor.other
item.page.dc.description.abstract
© The Author(s) 2019. Background: Bone quality in the distal tibia and talus is an important factor contributing to initial component stability in total ankle replacement (TAR). However, the effect of ankle arthritis on bone density in the tibia and talus remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare bone density of tibia and talus in arthritic and nonarthritic ankles as a function of distance from ankle joint. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 93 end-stage ankle arthritis patients who had preoperative nonweightbearing ankle computed tomography (CT) and identified a cohort of 83 nonarthritic ankle patients as a demographic-matched control group. A region of interest tool was used to calculate Hounsfield unit (HU) values in the cancellous region of the tibia and talus. Measurements were obtained on axial cut CTs from 6 to 12 mm above the tibial plafond, and 1 to 4 mm below the talar dome. HU measurements between groups and the decrease of HU at the relative level in each group were compared. Results: Arthritic ankles demonstrated significantly greater mean bone density than nonarthritic ankles at between 6 and 10 mm above the joint in the tibia (P <.05). No significant difference in bone density between 10 and 12 mm from the joint in the tibia nor at any level of the talus was found between groups. In both groups, bone density decreased significantly at each successive level away from the ankle joint. Conclusion: Ankle arthritis patients demonstrated greater or equal bone density in both the tibia and talus compared to demographic-matched controls. In both groups, bone density decreased with increasing distance away from the articular surface. In TAR, tibial bone resection between 6 and 8 mm may provide improved initial implant stability. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.