Publication:
Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality- adjusted life year in Thailand: Does the context of health gain matter?

dc.contributor.authorMontarat Thavorncharoensapen_US
dc.contributor.authorYot Teerawattananonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirin Natananten_US
dc.contributor.authorWantanee Kulpengen_US
dc.contributor.authorJomkwan Yothasamuten_US
dc.contributor.authorPitsaphun Werayingyongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:53:54Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:53:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-09en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aims to elicit the value of the willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and to examine the factors associated with the WTP for a QALY (WTP/QALY) value under the Thai health care setting. Methods: A community-based survey was conducted among 1191 randomly selected respondents. Each respondent was interviewed face-to-face to elicit his/her health state preference in each of three pairs of health conditions: (1) unilateral and bilateral blindness, (2) paraplegia and quadriplegia, and (3) mild and moderate allergies. A visual analog scale (VAS) and time trade off (TTO) were used as the eliciting methods. Subsequently, the respondents were asked about their WTP for the treatment and prevention of each pair of health conditions by using a bidding-game technique. Results: With regards to treatment, the mean WTP for a QALY value (WTP/QALYtreatment) estimated by the TTO method ranged from 59,000 to 285,000 baht (16.49 baht=US$1 purchasing power parity [PPP]). In contrast, the mean WTP for a QALY value in terms of prevention (WTP/QALYprevention) was significantly lower, ranging from 26,000 to 137,000 baht. Gender, household income, and hypothetical scenarios were also significant factors associated with the WTP/QALY values. Conclusion: The WTP/QALY values elicited in this study were approximately 0.4 to 2 times Thailand's 2008 GDP per capita. These values were in line with previous studies conducted in several different settings. This study's findings clearly support the opinion that a single ceiling threshold should not be used for the resource allocation of all types of interventions. © 2013 Thavorncharoensap etal, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. Vol.5, No.1 (2013), 29-36en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CEOR.S38062en_US
dc.identifier.issn11786981en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84872692347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/31707
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872692347&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEstimating the willingness to pay for a quality- adjusted life year in Thailand: Does the context of health gain matter?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872692347&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections