Publication: Sequential Radiographic Evaluation During Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture
Issued Date
2020-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15312291
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85076876876
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Vol.34, No.1 (2020), e26-e30
Suggested Citation
Direk Tantigate, Dorien Salentijn, James D. Lin, Christina E. Freibott, Robert J. Strauch, Melvin P. Rosenwasser Sequential Radiographic Evaluation During Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Vol.34, No.1 (2020), e26-e30. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001606 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49659
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Sequential Radiographic Evaluation During Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the null hypothesis that there is no significant change in radiographic parameters, which determines an acceptable reduction, beyond 3 weeks in distal radius fractures with closed treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively gathered registry of distal radius fractures. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent closed treatment of distal radius fracture. INTERVENTION: Sequential radiographic evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Change of radiographic measurement including radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, articular tilt, teardrop angle, anteroposterior distance, intra-articular gap, and step-off. We compared postreduction radiographic parameters once within 2 weeks, at the third week, at cessation of immobilization, and analyzed the interobserver reliability test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between radiographic measurements, which determined an acceptable reduction between radiographs performed within 2 weeks versus the third week. Radial inclination and ulnar variance were statistically different at the third week compared with the time of cessation of immobilization. Seventy-seven percent of patients who had an acceptable reduction after 2 weeks maintained acceptable alignment at cessation of immobilization. Eighty-five percent of patients with acceptable reduction after 3 weeks maintained acceptable alignment at cessation of immobilization. Radial shortening >1.8 mm at the third week predicts an unacceptable radiographic outcome at cessation of immobilization (sensitivity 94.5% and specificity 90%). CONCLUSION: Radiographic parameters that determine acceptable reduction for closed treatment of distal radius fractures change minimally after 3-week postacceptable closed reduction. Radial shortening at the third week can be used to predict an unacceptable radiographic outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.