Publication:
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Time Duration of Self-Completion Versus Assisted Completion in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Comparison

dc.contributor.authorAngelique Wongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupakarn Tayjasananten_US
dc.contributor.authorAlfredo Rodriguez-Nunezen_US
dc.contributor.authorMinjeong Parken_US
dc.contributor.authorDiane Liuen_US
dc.contributor.authorKresnier Perez Zapataen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulio Alloen_US
dc.contributor.authorSusan Frisbee-Humeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanet Williamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorEduardo Brueraen_US
dc.contributor.otherPontificia Universidad Católica de Chileen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T04:27:44Z
dc.date.available2020-12-28T04:27:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 AlphaMed Press Introduction: To compare the time duration of self-completion (SC) of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) by patients with advanced cancer (ACPs) versus assisted completion (AC) with a health care professional. Materials and Methods: In this randomized comparison of ACPs seen in initial consultation at the outpatient Supportive Care Center at MD Anderson, ACPs who have never completed the ESAS at MD Anderson were allocated (1:1) to either SC of the ESAS form versus AC by a nurse. Time of completion was measured by the nurse using a stopwatch. Patients completed the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) test prior to administration of the ESAS. In the SC group, the nurse reviewed the responses to verify that the reported ESAS scores were correct. Results: A total of 126 ACPs were enrolled (69 patients to AC and 57 to SC). Seventy-one patients were female, median age was 60 years, and median REALM score was 65. Median (interquartile range) time (in seconds) of SC was significantly less than AC (73 [42.9–89.1] vs. 109 [79.5–136.7], p <.0001). With nurse review time included, median time of SC increased to 117 seconds, which was not significantly different from AC (p =.28). Lower literacy (REALM) score and shortness of breath were significantly associated with increased completion time (p =.007). Conclusion: Regular use of ESAS will have minimal impact on clinical time, as it can be completed in about 1 minute and provides a concise yet comprehensive and multidimensional perspective of symptoms that affect quality of life of patients with cancer. Implications for Practice: Because the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale can be completed in less than 2 minutes, hopefully the routine use of this simple yet comprehensive and multidimensional symptom assessment tool will be used at all medical visits in all patients with cancer so that the timely management of symptoms affecting patients' lives and treatment courses can occur, further enhancing personalized cancer care.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOncologist. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/onco.13619en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549490Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn10837159en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85097907555en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60413
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097907555&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEdmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Time Duration of Self-Completion Versus Assisted Completion in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097907555&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections