Publication:
Groin dressing after cardiac catheterization. Comparison Between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm®) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®)

dc.contributor.authorSarana Boonbaichaiyaprucken_US
dc.contributor.authorPakorn Chanthanamattaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNongrak Intarayothaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSukit Yamvongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPisit Hutayanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorThongthip Dumrongwatanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanadee Krisdeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:44:16Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:44:16Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPost cardiac catheterization puncture site care is usually done with a tight pressure dressing by an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®) due to the belief that it should prevent bleeding. The practice is uncomfortable to the patients. The authors compared a new way of dressing using light transparent tape (Tegaderm®) to the conventional tight pressure one. 126 post coronary angiography patients were randomized to have their groins dressed either with Tensoplast® or with Tegaderm®. Patients ambulated 8 hours after the procedures. The groin was evaluated for pain, discomfort and bleeding complications. 49 per cent in the Tensoplast® vs 26.9 per cent in the Tegaderm® group experienced pain (p value of 0.01). 55.5 per cent in the Tensoplast® group vs 11.1 per cent in the Tegaderm® group reported discomfort. 4.7 per cent in the Tensoplast® vs 1.6 per cent in the Tegaderm® group developed bleeding or hematoma. Dressing of the puncture site after cardiac catheterization with Tegaderm® was more comfortable than the conventional Tensoplast® without any difference in bleeding complications.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.84, No.12 (2001), 1721-1728en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0035564071en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26647
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035564071&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleGroin dressing after cardiac catheterization. Comparison Between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm®) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035564071&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections