Publication: Groin dressing after cardiac catheterization. Comparison Between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm®) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®)
dc.contributor.author | Sarana Boonbaichaiyapruck | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pakorn Chanthanamatta | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nongrak Intarayotha | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sukit Yamvong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pisit Hutayanon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thongthip Dumrongwatana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vanadee Krisdee | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-07T09:44:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-07T09:44:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-12-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Post cardiac catheterization puncture site care is usually done with a tight pressure dressing by an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®) due to the belief that it should prevent bleeding. The practice is uncomfortable to the patients. The authors compared a new way of dressing using light transparent tape (Tegaderm®) to the conventional tight pressure one. 126 post coronary angiography patients were randomized to have their groins dressed either with Tensoplast® or with Tegaderm®. Patients ambulated 8 hours after the procedures. The groin was evaluated for pain, discomfort and bleeding complications. 49 per cent in the Tensoplast® vs 26.9 per cent in the Tegaderm® group experienced pain (p value of 0.01). 55.5 per cent in the Tensoplast® group vs 11.1 per cent in the Tegaderm® group reported discomfort. 4.7 per cent in the Tensoplast® vs 1.6 per cent in the Tegaderm® group developed bleeding or hematoma. Dressing of the puncture site after cardiac catheterization with Tegaderm® was more comfortable than the conventional Tensoplast® without any difference in bleeding complications. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.84, No.12 (2001), 1721-1728 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-0035564071 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26647 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035564071&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Groin dressing after cardiac catheterization. Comparison Between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm®) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast®) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035564071&origin=inward | en_US |