Publication:
Outcomes for relapsed versus resistant low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia following single-agent chemotherapy

dc.contributor.authorNida Jareemiten_US
dc.contributor.authorNeil S. Horowitzen_US
dc.contributor.authorDonald P. Goldsteinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoss S. Berkowitzen_US
dc.contributor.authorKevin M. Eliasen_US
dc.contributor.otherDana-Farber Cancer Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherNew England Trophoblastic Disease Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T06:05:18Z
dc.date.available2020-12-28T06:05:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Objective: To compare outcomes for relapsed versus resistant low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) following single-agent chemotherapy. Methods: This was a single center retrospective study of low risk GTN. Cases failing to achieve a normal hCG with first-line therapy were defined as chemotherapy resistance. Cases achieving hCG remission, but recurring, were defined as relapse. Primary endpoints were remission rate with second-line therapy and time to remission. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define prognostic factors. Results: Among 877 low risk GTN patients there were 124 (14.8%) chemotherapy resistant and 22 (2.6%) relapse cases. Complete remission rates with second-line therapy were similar between relapse (77.3%) and resistant (76.6%) cases (p = 0.95), but resistance was associated with a longer time to reach complete remission with second-line therapy (median 8.3 vs 4.9 weeks; p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors for second-line therapy remission and time to second-line therapy remission were use of multi-agent chemotherapy (OR of 9.45; 95%CI, 2.13–41.97; p = 0.003) and primary chemo-resistance (HR of 0.27; 95%CI, 0.12–0.59; p = 0.001), respectively. With additional therapies, sustained remission rates rose to 90% (18/20) for relapse and 99.2% (120/121) for chemo-resistance (p = 0.053). Conclusions: Although second-line therapy for resistant or relapsed low risk GTN is able to achieve complete remission in most cases, time to complete remission for relapsed disease was shorter than for resistant disease. Further studies on the biologic differences between resistant and relapsed disease may clarify the optimal treatment for these clinical situations.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGynecologic Oncology. Vol.159, No.3 (2020), 751-757en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.046en_US
dc.identifier.issn10956859en_US
dc.identifier.issn00908258en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85092014536en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60541
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092014536&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleOutcomes for relapsed versus resistant low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia following single-agent chemotherapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092014536&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections