Publication: Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiangiogenics in antiresorptive-naïve patient: A comprehensive review of the literature
Issued Date
2018-04-23
Resource Type
ISSN
23146141
23146133
23146133
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85046854599
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BioMed Research International. Vol.2018, (2018)
Suggested Citation
Kununya Pimolbutr, Stephen Porter, Stefano Fedele Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiangiogenics in antiresorptive-naïve patient: A comprehensive review of the literature. BioMed Research International. Vol.2018, (2018). doi:10.1155/2018/8071579 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45184
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiangiogenics in antiresorptive-naïve patient: A comprehensive review of the literature
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 Kununya Pimolbutr et al. Objectives. To review the available literature on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) associated with antiangiogenics in antiresorptive-naïve individuals. Methods. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science in December 2017. Results. We identified reports describing a total of 35 antiresorptive drugs-naïve patients who developed antiangiogenic-related MRONJ. The mean age of these patients was 59.06 years and the F: M ratio was 4: 5. The most common underlying disease was metastatic renal cell cancer. Pain to the mandible was the most common complaint (34.29%) and the majority of patients presented with bone exposure. The mean duration of intravenous and oral antiangiogenics before MRONJ development was 6.5 and 16.72 months, respectively. The most common additional risk factor was dental extraction (37.14%). Almost half of the MRONJ patients (48.57%) received surgical treatment. 18 patients (62.06%) were reported to have disease resolution within an average time of 6.75 months. Conclusion. MRONJ associated with antiangiogenic therapy in antiresorptive-naïve patients is a rare but potentially serious adverse effect. Available data suggests that there might be notable differences between MRONJ associated with antiangiogenics and antiresorptives; however, further prospective well-designed studies are required.