Publication:
The utility of single-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disorders according to their clinical manifestations: a retrospective review

dc.contributor.authorVarayu Prachayakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorakod Deesomsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorPitulak Aswakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Leelakusolvongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Siriraj Hospital. Department of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-04T05:19:47Z
dc.date.available2017-08-04T05:19:47Z
dc.date.created2017-08-04
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBackground: The advent of double-balloon enteroscopy has enabled more accurate diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders. Single-balloon enteroscopy permits visualization of the entire small intestine less often than does double-balloon enteroscopy. However, the relative clinical advantages of the 2 methods remain controversial. This study therefore aimed to identify the indications for and therapeutic impact of performing single-balloon enteroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from adults who underwent single-balloon enteroscopy from January 2007 through November 2011 and analyzed their baseline characteristics, endoscopic findings, pathological diagnoses, and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 145 procedures were performed in 116 patients with a mean age of 58.1 ± 17.7 years (range, 18–89 years). The most common indications for performing single-balloon enteroscopy were overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, chronic diarrhea, and occult GI bleeding, accounting for 57.9%, 12.4%, and 9.7% of the patients, respectively. The area of interest was achieved in 80.7% of the cases, with a 5.5% rate of technical failure. An overall positive finding was detected in 65.5% of the cases, of which 33.8% were ulcers and erosions; 8.3%, masses; and 3.4%, angiodysplasia. The diagnostic yields were 42.9%, 52.4%, 78.6%, 50.0%, and 25.0% for patients with overt GI bleeding, occult GI bleeding, abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and abnormal imaging results, respectively. Therapeutic procedures were performed in 11% of patients with GI bleeding and achieved a therapeutic yield of 14.6% with a minor complication rate of 11.7%. Conclusions: Single-balloon enteroscopy was effective for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders, especially in patients who presented with abdominal pain, GI bleeding, or focal abnormalities on imaging scans.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterology. Vol. 13, (2013), 103en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-230X-13-103
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/2654
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectSingle balloonen_US
dc.subjectEnteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic impactsen_US
dc.subjectIndicationsen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.titleThe utility of single-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disorders according to their clinical manifestations: a retrospective reviewen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mods.location.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/13/103en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
si-ar-varayu-2013.pdf
Size:
300.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections