Publication: The utility of single-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disorders according to their clinical manifestations: a retrospective review
dc.contributor.author | Varayu Prachayakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morakod Deesomsak | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pitulak Aswakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Somchai Leelakusolvong | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University. Siriraj Hospital. Department of Internal Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-04T05:19:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-04T05:19:47Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-08-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The advent of double-balloon enteroscopy has enabled more accurate diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders. Single-balloon enteroscopy permits visualization of the entire small intestine less often than does double-balloon enteroscopy. However, the relative clinical advantages of the 2 methods remain controversial. This study therefore aimed to identify the indications for and therapeutic impact of performing single-balloon enteroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from adults who underwent single-balloon enteroscopy from January 2007 through November 2011 and analyzed their baseline characteristics, endoscopic findings, pathological diagnoses, and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 145 procedures were performed in 116 patients with a mean age of 58.1 ± 17.7 years (range, 18–89 years). The most common indications for performing single-balloon enteroscopy were overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, chronic diarrhea, and occult GI bleeding, accounting for 57.9%, 12.4%, and 9.7% of the patients, respectively. The area of interest was achieved in 80.7% of the cases, with a 5.5% rate of technical failure. An overall positive finding was detected in 65.5% of the cases, of which 33.8% were ulcers and erosions; 8.3%, masses; and 3.4%, angiodysplasia. The diagnostic yields were 42.9%, 52.4%, 78.6%, 50.0%, and 25.0% for patients with overt GI bleeding, occult GI bleeding, abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and abnormal imaging results, respectively. Therapeutic procedures were performed in 11% of patients with GI bleeding and achieved a therapeutic yield of 14.6% with a minor complication rate of 11.7%. Conclusions: Single-balloon enteroscopy was effective for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders, especially in patients who presented with abdominal pain, GI bleeding, or focal abnormalities on imaging scans. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Gastroenterology. Vol. 13, (2013), 103 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1471-230X-13-103 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/2654 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access article | en_US |
dc.subject | Single balloon | en_US |
dc.subject | Enteroscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Therapeutic impacts | en_US |
dc.subject | Indications | en_US |
dc.subject | Complications | en_US |
dc.title | The utility of single-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disorders according to their clinical manifestations: a retrospective review | en_US |
dc.type | Research Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mods.location.url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/13/103 | en_US |