Publication:
Nociceptive receptors are expressed differently in trigeminal nociception after lingual nerve injury and unilateral external carotid artery occlusion in rats

dc.contributor.authorAree Wanasuntronwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisaluk Punyawattananonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattapon Rotpenpianen_US
dc.contributor.authorRittinarong Meepongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnan Srikiatkhachornen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabangen_US
dc.contributor.otherBurapha Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:08:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:08:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the different changes in nociceptive activity between two animal models of trigeminal neuropathic pain: unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush in rats. Design: In this study, changes in nociceptive activity were investigated in unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush models of trigeminal neuropathic pain in rats. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) evoked by capsaicin application on the tongue of rats were recorded in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. In addition, immunohistochemistry was performed in the trigeminal ganglia and trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Results: The fEPSP in unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush rats was irregular relative to that in sham rats. In particular, the fEPSP spike in lingual nerve crush rats had a higher amplitude and shorter duration than that in sham rats. Unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush also increased c-fos expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Upregulation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 in trigeminal ganglion was observed in unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush rats, whereas upregulation of purinergic receptor subtype 3 in trigeminal ganglion was observed only in lingual nerve crush rats. Conclusions: Although unilateral external carotid artery ischemic reperfusion and lingual nerve crush similarly increased nociceptive activity at the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, the fEPSPs and expression of nociceptive peripheral afferent neurons were different. Therefore, direct and indirect nerve injuries apparently induced the same nociceptive activity by different signaling responses dependent on nociceptive receptors.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Oral Biology. Vol.126, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105128en_US
dc.identifier.issn18791506en_US
dc.identifier.issn00039969en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85105324547en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76165
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105324547&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNociceptive receptors are expressed differently in trigeminal nociception after lingual nerve injury and unilateral external carotid artery occlusion in ratsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105324547&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections