Publication:
Risk behaviour and time as covariates for efficacy of the HIV vaccine regimen ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E: A post-hoc analysis of the Thai phase 3 efficacy trial RV 144

dc.contributor.authorMerlin L. Robben_US
dc.contributor.authorSupachai Rerks-Ngarmen_US
dc.contributor.authorSorachai Nitayaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPunnee Pitisuttithumen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaranit Kaewkungwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrayura Kunasolen_US
dc.contributor.authorChirasak Khamboonruangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrasert Thongcharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatricia Morganen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael Benensonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert M. Parisen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoseph Chiuen_US
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth Adamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorDonald Francisen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanjay Gurunathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJim Tartagliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Gilberten_US
dc.contributor.authorDon Stableinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson L. Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorJerome H. Kimen_US
dc.contributor.otherWalter Reed Army Institute of Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBiophicsen_US
dc.contributor.otherHenry Jackson Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherWalter Reed National Military Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.contributor.otherGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.contributor.otherSanofi Pasteuren_US
dc.contributor.otherFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherThe EMMES Corporationen_US
dc.contributor.otherUS Army Medical Materiel Development Activityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:09:14Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:09:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Thai phase 3 HIV vaccine trial RV 144 showed modest efficacy of a vaccine against HIV acquisition. Baseline variables of age, sex, marital status, and risk did not modify vaccine efficacy. We did a post-hoc analysis of the trial's data to investigate behavioural risk and efficacy every 6 months after vaccination. Methods: RV 144 was a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial testing the combination of the HIV vaccines ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E to prevent HIV infection or reduce setpoint viral load. Male and female volunteers aged 18-30 years were recruited from the community. In this post-hoc analysis of the modified intention-to-treat population (16 395 participants), HIV risk behaviour was assessed with a self-administered questionnaire at the time of initial vaccination in the trial and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years. We classified participants' behaviour as low, medium, or high risk. Both the acquisition endpoint and the early viral-load endpoint were examined for interactions with risk status over time and temporal effects after vaccination. Multiple proportional hazards regression models with treatment and time-varying risk covariates were analysed. Findings: Risk of acquisition of HIV was low in each risk group, but 9187 (58·2%) participants reported higher-risk behaviour at least once during the study. Participants classified as high or increasing risk at least once during follow-up were compared with those who maintained low-risk or medium-risk behaviour as a time-varying covariate, and the interaction of risk status and acquisition efficacy was significant (p=0·01), with greater benefit in low-risk individuals. Vaccine efficacy seemed to peak early-cumulative vaccine efficacy was estimated to be 60·5% (95% CI 22-80) through the 12 months after initial vaccination-and declined quickly. Vaccination did not seem to affect viral load in either early or late infections. Interpretation: Future HIV vaccine trials should recognise potential interactions between challenge intensity and risk heterogeneity in both population and treatment effects. The regimen tested in the RV 144 phase 3 trial might benefit from extended immunisation schedules. Funding: US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Infectious Diseases. Vol.12, No.7 (2012), 531-537en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70088-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn14744457en_US
dc.identifier.issn14733099en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84862764447en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14760
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862764447&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRisk behaviour and time as covariates for efficacy of the HIV vaccine regimen ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E: A post-hoc analysis of the Thai phase 3 efficacy trial RV 144en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862764447&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections