Publication:
Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: An open randomized, non-inferiority, trial

dc.contributor.authorGhulam Rahim Awaben_US
dc.contributor.authorSasithon Pukrittayakameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMallika Imwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorArjen M. Dondorpen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharles J. Woodrowen_US
dc.contributor.authorSue Jean Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas Pj Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorPratap Singhasivanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaizullah Kakeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMinistry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherChurchill Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Londonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:06:40Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:06:40Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-22en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Afghanistan's national guidelines recommend chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax infection, the parasite responsible for the majority of its malaria burden. Chloroquine resistance in P. vivax is emerging in Asia. Therapeutic responses across Afghanistan have not been evaluated in detail. Methods. Between July 2007 and February 2009, an open-label, randomized controlled trial of chloroquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients aged three months and over with slide-confirmed P. vivax mono-infections was conducted. Consistent with current national guidelines, primaquine was not administered. Subjects were followed up daily during the acute phase of illness (days 0-3) and weekly until day 56. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative parasitological failure rate at day 56 after the start of treatment, with the hypothesis being that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was non-inferior compared to chloroquine ( = 5% difference in proportion of failures). Results. Of 2,182 individuals with positive blood films for P. vivax, 536 were enrolled in the trial. The day 28 cure rate was 100% in both treatment groups. Parasite clearance was more rapid with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine than chloroquine. At day 56, there were more recurrent infections in the chloroquine arm (8.9%, 95% CI 6.0-13.1%) than the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm (2.8%, 95% CI 1.4-5.8%), a difference in cumulative recurrence rate of 6.1% (2-sided 90%CI +2.6 to +9.7%). The log-rank test comparing the survival curves confirmed the superiority of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine over chloroquine (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that a lower initial haemoglobin concentration was also independently associated with recurrence. Both regimens were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions. Chloroquine remains an efficacious treatment for the treatment of vivax malaria in Afghanistan. In a setting where radical therapy cannot be administered, dihydroartemisinin- piperaquine provides additional benefit in terms of post-treatment prophylaxis, reducing the incidence of recurrence from 4-8 weeks after treatment. Trial Registration. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00682578. © 2010 Awab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.9, No.1 (2010)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-2875-9-105en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77951054683en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/29241
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77951054683&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: An open randomized, non-inferiority, trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77951054683&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections