Publication:
Comparison of outbreaks of H5N1 highly pathogenic AVIAN influenza in wild birds and poultry in thailand

dc.contributor.authorJarunee Siengsananen_US
dc.contributor.authorKridsada Chaichouneen_US
dc.contributor.authorRassameepen Phonaknguenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLadawan Sariyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhirom Prompiramen_US
dc.contributor.authorWaraporn Kocharinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSririporn Tangsudjaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSarin Suwanpukdeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWitthawat Wiriyaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorRattapan Pattanarangsanen_US
dc.contributor.authorIan Robertsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuart D. Blacksellen_US
dc.contributor.authorParntep Ratanakornen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMurdoch Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T06:20:15Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T06:20:15Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractWild bird surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus from 2004 to 2007 in Thailand indicated that the prevalence of infection with avian influenza H5N1 virus in wild birds was low (1.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-1.2, 60/6, 263 pooled samples). However, the annual prevalence varied considerably over this period, with a peak of 2.7% (95% CI 1.4, 4.1) in 2004. Prevalence dropped to 0.5% (95% CI 0.3, 0.8]) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.3, 1.0) in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and then increased to 1.8% (95% CI 1.0, 2.6) in 2007. During this period, 16 species from 12 families of wild birds tested positive for H5N1 virus infection. All samples from juvenile birds were negative for H5N1 virus, whereas 0.6% (95% CI 0.4, 0.9) of pooled samples from adult birds were positive. Most positive samples originated from peridomestic resident species. Infected wild bird samples were only found in provinces where poultry outbreaks had occurred. Detection of H5N1 virus infection in wild birds was reported up to 3 yr after eradication of the poultry outbreaks in those provinces. As observed with outbreaks in poultry, the frequencies of H5N1 outbreaks in wild birds were significantly higher in winter. Further understanding of the mechanisms of persistence and ongoing HPAI H5N1 transmission between wild birds and domestic poultry is needed. © 2009 Wildlife Disease Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Wildlife Diseases. Vol.45, No.3 (2009), 740-747en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7589/0090-3558-45.3.740en_US
dc.identifier.issn00903558en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-70349316974en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/27078
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349316974&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleComparison of outbreaks of H5N1 highly pathogenic AVIAN influenza in wild birds and poultry in thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349316974&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections