Publication: Specific monoclonal antibodies to Strongyloides stercoralis: A potential diagnostic reagent for strongyloidiasis
2
Issued Date
2002-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
0125877X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-0038637905
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology. Vol.20, No.4 (2002), 247-256
Suggested Citation
Piyanan Taweethavonsawat, Wanpen Chaicumpa, Urai Chaisri, Usa Chuenbal, Yuwaporn Sakolvaree, Pramuan Tapchaisri, Thitima Wongsaroj Specific monoclonal antibodies to Strongyloides stercoralis: A potential diagnostic reagent for strongyloidiasis. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology. Vol.20, No.4 (2002), 247-256. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/20182
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Specific monoclonal antibodies to Strongyloides stercoralis: A potential diagnostic reagent for strongyloidiasis
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
In this study, specific hybridomas secreting monoclonal anti-bodies (MAb) to antigen of Strongyloldes stercoralis filariform larvae were produced. Specific epitopes targeted by the MAb were protein in nature and located in situ in the internal content of the filariform larvae of the parasite but not in the esophagus. The MAb reacted to the homologous antigen in an indirect ELISA but did not reveal any reaction to the SDS-PAGE separated-homologous antigen in a Western blot analysis (WB) suggesting a conformational epitope specificity. The MAb were of lgG1 isotype which is the isotype known to have high affinity to this epitope so they were used in a dot-ELISA to detect the antigen of the parasite. The assay could detect the epitopes in 78 ng or more of the crude filariform larval extract but did not reveal any positive result when applied to detect antigen in stool samples of parasitologically confirmed strongyloidiasis patients. The negative antigen test results can be explained as follows. Either the MAb were filariform stage-specific and thus did not recognize the rhabditiform larval antigen mainly contained in the patient's stool or the amounts of antigen in the stool samples were too small and/or unevenly dispersed. In the latter instance, the MAb developed in this study would have a diagnostic potential if used in an immunological test design where more volume of fresh stool sample could be accommodated in the test, e.g. a sandwich plate ELISA.