Publication: Case Studies in Physiology: Physiological and clinical effects of temporary diaphragm pacing in two patients with ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction
Issued Date
2021-06-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15221601
87507587
87507587
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85108452784
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol.130, No.6 (2021), 1736-1742
Suggested Citation
Elena Keough-Delgado, Lucía Lopez-Rodríguez, Beatríz de Olaiz, Agustín Bertomeu-García, Óscar Peñuelas, Marta Jimenez-Fernández, Pedro Gato-Díaz, Helene Perez-Domínguez, Francisco Perez-Vizcaíno, Marcus J. Schultz, Jose A. Lorente Case Studies in Physiology: Physiological and clinical effects of temporary diaphragm pacing in two patients with ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol.130, No.6 (2021), 1736-1742. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00543.2020 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76152
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Case Studies in Physiology: Physiological and clinical effects of temporary diaphragm pacing in two patients with ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction
Abstract
Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) is increasingly recognized as an important side-effect of invasive ventilation in critically ill patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Whether patients with VIDD benefit from temporary diaphragm pacing is uncertain. Intramuscular diaphragmatic electrodes were implanted for temporary stimulation with a pacing device (TransAeris System) in two patients with VIDD. The electrodes were implanted via laparoscopy (first patient) or via bilateral thoracoscopy (second patient). Stimulation parameters were titrated according to tolerance. Diaphragm thickening fraction by ultrasound, maximum inspiratory pressure (Pimax) and diaphragm electromyography (EMGdi) signal analysis were used to monitor the response to diaphragm pacing. Both patients tolerated diaphragm pacing. In the first patient, improvements in diaphragm excursions were noted once pacing was initiated and diaphragm thickening fraction did not further deteriorate over time. The diaphragm thickening fraction improved in the second patient, and Pimax as well as EMGdi analysis suggested improved muscle function. This patient could be fully weaned from the ventilator. These case reports present the first experience with temporary diaphragm pacing in critically ill patients with VIDD. Our results should be taken cautiously given the reduced sample size, but provide the proof of concept to put forward the hypothesis that a course of diaphragm pacing may be associated with improved diaphragmatic function. Our findings of the tolerance to the procedure and the beneficial physiological effects are not prove of safety and efficacy, but may set the ground to design and conduct larger studies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Diaphragmatic electrode implantation and temporary diaphragm pacing have not been previously used in ICU patients with VIDD. Patients were monitored using a multimodal monitoring approach including ultrasound of the diaphragm, measurement of maximum inspiratory pressure and EMG signal analysis. Our results suggest that diaphragm pacing may improve diaphragmatic function, with the potential to prevent and treat VIDD in critically ill patients. Safety and efficacy of this intervention is yet to be proven in larger studies.