Publication:
Risk factors for recurrent melioidosis in northeast Thailand

dc.contributor.authorDirek Limmathurotsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWipada Chaowagulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWirongrong Chierakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKasia Stepniewskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBina Maharjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanaporn Wuthiekanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas P J Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorSharon J. Peacocken_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSappasitthiprasong Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T07:00:21Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T07:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2006-10-15en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Recurrent melioidosis occurs in ∼6% of patients in the first year following the initial presentation. A recent study revealed that 25% of patients with recurrence had reinfection rather than a relapse resulting from a failure to cure. The aim of this study was to reevaluate these 2 patient groups to define their individual risk factors. Methods. All adult patients who presented to Sappasithiprasong Hospital (Ubon Ratchathani, in northeast Thailand) with culture-confirmed melioidosis during the period 1986-2004 and who survived to receive oral antimicrobial therapy were observed until July 2005. Clinical factors and antimicrobial treatment of patients with recurrent disease due to relapse or reinfection, as confirmed by bacterial genotyping, were compared using a time-varying Cox proportional hazard model. Results. Of 889 patients who survived and underwent follow-up, 86 patients (9.7%) presented with relapse, and 30 patients (3.4%) became reinfected. There was no difference in acute outcome between the relapse and reinfection groups. No risk factors for reinfection were identified. Multivariate analyses identified choice and duration of oral antimicrobial therapy as the most important determinants of relapse, followed by positive blood culture result (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.92) and multifocal distribution (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.03-3.67). Patients treated with an appropriate oral antibiotic regimen for 12-16 weeks had a 90% decreased risk of relapse (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.44), compared with patients who were treated for ≤8 weeks. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus doxycycline was an effective oral therapy. Conclusions. This study highlights clinical factors associated with an increased likelihood of relapse and provides vidence for optimal oral antimicrobial therapy. © 2006 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Infectious Diseases. Vol.43, No.8 (2006), 979-986en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/507632en_US
dc.identifier.issn10584838en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33750358737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23298
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33750358737&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleRisk factors for recurrent melioidosis in northeast Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33750358737&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections