Publication:
Midline incisional hernia prophylaxis using synthetic mesh in an emergency or urgent gastrointestinal tract surgery: A protocol for multicentre randomised clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorAmarit Tansaweten_US
dc.contributor.authorPawin Numthavajen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreeda Sumritpraditen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuphakarn Techapongsatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorGareth Mckayen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Medicine and Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen's University Belfasten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:12:38Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:12:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-03en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Between 5% and 30% of abdominal incisions eventually result in incisional hernias (IHs) that can lead to severe complications and impaired quality of life. Unfortunately, IH repair is often unsuccessful; therefore, hernia prophylaxis is an important issue. The efficacy of mesh augmentation has been proven for hernia prophylaxis in high-risk patients, but no randomised clinical trial has evaluated prophylactic mesh placement in emergency/urgent gastrointestinal operations. Methods and analysis A multicentre, prospective randomised, open and patient-assessor blinded endpoint design will be conducted. A total of 470 patients will be enrolled and randomly allocated to retrorectus mesh augmentation with lightweight polypropylene mesh or primary suture closure. The primary outcome is IH occurrence within 24 months of follow-up, while other clinical outcomes are secondary endpoints. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal and provider perspectives. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from Ramathibodi Hospital (MURA2020/1478) and Vajira Hospital (COA164/2563). The protocol is on the process of submission to the local ethics committee of the other study sites. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. Vol.11, No.9 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045541en_US
dc.identifier.issn20446055en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85114453180en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77860
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114453180&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMidline incisional hernia prophylaxis using synthetic mesh in an emergency or urgent gastrointestinal tract surgery: A protocol for multicentre randomised clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114453180&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections