Publication:
HBA as a potential alternative to the tunel assay for assessment of dna integrity in asthenozoospermic spermatozoa

dc.contributor.authorPitak Laokirkkiaten_US
dc.contributor.authorPaweena Sarakarnkosolen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsarin Thanaboonyawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsin Petyimen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaparath Prechapanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuphadtra Phornwilardsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorNoira Nigmatovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoungsin Choavaratanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherTaksin Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherGenome Astanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:36:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the appropriateness of the hyaluronan binding assay (HBA) for assessment of DNA integrity indirectly in asthenozoospermic spermatozoa, by studying its correlation with the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Methods: Thirty asthenozoospermic semen samples of infertile couples were recruited. Semen analysis was performed before being processed by HBA and the TUNEL assay. All the semen parameters were recorded and analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.1 ± 6.4 years. The average total and progressive motility was 33.5 ± 11.0% and 21.9 ± 6.6%, respectively. The mean TUNEL-positive and hyaluronan-bound sperm were 17.8 ± 6.4% and 57.2 ± 14.5%, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a high negative correlation between HBA and the TUNEL assay (r = -0.73, p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficients revealed a high level of agreement between two observers who evaluated the TUNEL-positive and hyaluronan-bound sperm [0.81 (95% CI: 0.65-0.91) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96)], respectively. Conclusion: The study results showed a high negative correlation between HBA and the TUNEL assay. This suggests that HBA may be used as a viable intact DNA spermatozoa identification method, as a potential alternative to the TUNEL assay, in asthenozoospermia sperm.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.70, No.1 (2018), 70-76en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14456/smj.2018.12en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85051595566en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47178
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051595566&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHBA as a potential alternative to the tunel assay for assessment of dna integrity in asthenozoospermic spermatozoaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051595566&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections