Publication:
Agreement between emergency physicians and a cardiologist on cardiac function evaluation after short training

dc.contributor.authorApichaya Monsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorThiti Patarateeranonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurat Tongyooen_US
dc.contributor.authorUsapan Surabenjawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorWansiri Chaisirinen_US
dc.contributor.authorTipa Chakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattakarn Praphruetkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorOnlak Ruangsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanyaporn Nakornchaien_US
dc.contributor.otherTaksin Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:30:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: Delayed diagnosis and treatment of shock patients may lead to multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and death. Volume status assessment in shock patients is crucial for guiding early management. Focused echocardiography has become an important tool for assessing volume status because it is non-invasive and easy to perform. We aimed to ascertain the degree of agreement between emergency medicine (EM) residents and a cardiologist on cardiac function evaluations using echocardiography. We also assessed the extent of agreement on pericardial effusion diagnoses. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Department, Siriraj Hospital. The EM residents who had limited experience in ultrasound examination underwent a 3-hour echocardiography training course consisting of a lecture and a workshop before starting the study. Patients with shock or suspected hypervolemia were included. Echocardiography was performed by EM residents to evaluate ventricular function of each patients. With visual estimation, they classified the left ventricular function (LVF) into 3 categories: good, moderate and poor. The video files were recorded and re-evaluated by a cardiologist offline. The correlation of left ventricular function estimation and the diagnosis of pericardial effusion between the two operators were determined. Results: Ninety-two patients were enrolled between October and December 2014. The overall agreement of ventricular function assessment between the EM residents and the cardiologist was 79.4% (weighted kappa = 0.73). The degree of agreements of LVF classified as poor, moderate and good LVF were 87.5%, 37.5% and 95% respectively. Moreover, the residents diagnosed the pericardial effusion with 100% accuracy, compared to the cardiologist. Conclusion: Following a short educational training, the EM residents efficiently assessed the left ventricular function with a high level of agreement with a cardiologist.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.4 (2019), 253-260en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/Smj.2019.39en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070746569en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52249
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070746569&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAgreement between emergency physicians and a cardiologist on cardiac function evaluation after short trainingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070746569&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections