Publication:
Glucose tolerance in rural diabetic Thais, first-degree relatives and non-diabetic controls

dc.contributor.authorTimothy Mark Earls Davisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPakorn Pramukkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorYupin Suputtamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorWipada Chaowagulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Levyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherSappasitthiprasong Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T06:52:38Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T06:52:38Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractTo determine whether non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in a rural Thai population is characterised by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, 17 unselected diabetic outpatients from a regional hospital, five first-degree relatives and 10 healthy controls were studied. Subjects in these groups were matched as closely as possible for age and sex, and mean body mass indices were similar (mean ± S.D.; 21.8 ± 5.5, 20.6 ± 1.4 and 21.8 ± 2.3 kg/m2, respectively, P > 0.5). Beta-cell function (%B) and insulin sensitivity (%S), expressed relative to values for non-diabetic Caucasians, were assessed mathematically using the 'CIGMA' model and plasma glucose and insulin achieved after a standard 1-h glucose infusion. The diabetic patients had higher fasting plasma glucose concentrations than the controls (8.6 ± 4.0 vs. 4.6 ± 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.01) but plasma insulin levels were comparable (geometric mean [-S.D.-+S.D.]; 4.0 [1.7-9.4] vs. 4.0 [1.7-9.2] mU/l, P > 0.1). %B in the diabetic group (21% [10-41]) was lower than in the controls (128% [88-187], P < 0.001) while %S tended to be higher (185% [86-400] vs. 111% [49-251], 0.1 > P > 0.05). Relatives had intermediate values of both variables. %S and %B correlated poorly in the diabetic group (P > 0.1) but together accounted for 90% of the variation in basal plasma glucose (multiple r = 0.95, n = 17, P < 0.0001). Beta-cell dysfunction appears the primary defect in diabetic patients from a Thai subsistence farming population. Insulin resistance may not always characterise NIDDM in geographical areas where a 'thrifty genotype' would be expected; other factors associated with diabetes in developing countries (such increased susceptibility to serious infections) may also influence diabetes prevalence. © 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice. Vol.27, No.3 (1995), 171-180en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0168-8227(95)01039-Gen_US
dc.identifier.issn01688227en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0029002278en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17261
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029002278&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleGlucose tolerance in rural diabetic Thais, first-degree relatives and non-diabetic controlsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029002278&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections