Publication:
Efficacy and safety of atovaquone/proguanil compared with mefloquine for treatment of acute Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSornchai Looareesuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoirat Wilairatanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKobsiri Chalermaruten_US
dc.contributor.authorYupin Rattanapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorCraig J. Canfielden_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid B.A. Hutchinsonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPharmaceutical Systems Inc.en_US
dc.contributor.otherBetsoms Farmhouseen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T08:51:46Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T08:51:46Z
dc.date.issued1999-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe increasing frequency of therapeutic failures in falciparum malaria underscores the need for novel, rapidly effective antimalarial drugs or drug combinations. Atovaquone and proguanil are blood schizonticides that demonstrate synergistic activity against multi-drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. In an open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in Thailand, adult patients with acute P. falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with atovaquone and proguanil/hydrochloride (1,000 mg and 400 mg, respectively, administered orally at 24-hr intervals for three doses) or mefloquine (750 mg administered orally, followed 6 hr later by an additional 500-mg dose). Efficacy was assessed by cure rate (the percentage of patients in whom parasitemia was eliminated and did not recur during 28 days of follow-up), parasite clearance time (PCT), and fever clearance time (FCT). Safety was assessed by sequential clinical and laboratory assessments for 28 days. Atovaquone/proguanil was significantly more effective than mefloquine (cure rate 100% [79 of 79] vs. 86% [68 of 79]; P < 0.002). The atovaquone/proguanil and mefloquine treatments did not differ with respect to PCT (mean = 65 hr versus 74 hr) or FCT (mean = 59 hr versus 51 hr). Adverse events were generally typical of malaria symptoms and each occurred in < 10% of the patients in either group, with the exception of increased vomiting found in the atovaquone/proguanil group. Transient elevations of liver enzyme levels occurred more frequently in patients treated with atovaquone/proguanil than with mefloquine, but the differences were not significant and values returned to normal by day 28 in most patients. The combination of atovaquone and proguanil was well tolerated and more effective than mefloquine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria in Thailand.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.60, No.4 (1999), 526-532en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.526en_US
dc.identifier.issn00029637en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0032927288en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/25468
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032927288&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of atovaquone/proguanil compared with mefloquine for treatment of acute Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032927288&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections