Publication: Differences among Thai agricultural workers' health, working conditions, and pesticide use by farm type
Issued Date
2018-03-01
Resource Type
ISSN
23987316
23987308
23987308
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85044441182
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Annals of Work Exposures and Health. Vol.62, No.2 (2018), 167-181
Suggested Citation
Pornpimol Kongtip, Noppanun Nankongnab, Redeerat Mahaboonpeeti, Sasivimol Bootsikeaw, Kiattisak Batsungnoen, Chalalai Hanchenlaksh, Mathuros Tipayamongkholgul, Susan Woskie Differences among Thai agricultural workers' health, working conditions, and pesticide use by farm type. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. Vol.62, No.2 (2018), 167-181. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx099 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46921
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Differences among Thai agricultural workers' health, working conditions, and pesticide use by farm type
Abstract
© The Author(s) 2018. More than 11 million Thai people (38%) work in agriculture, but since most are in the informal sector, government enforcement and support are very limited. As a result, working conditions on Thai farms vary greatly, putting the health of many agricultural workers at risk. A cross-sectional study in three Thai provinces collected information on the work activities and conditions of 424 farmers representing five farm types: Rice, vegetable, flower, rice/vegetable, and flower/vegetable. The agricultural workers were mainly women (60%); their average age was 53 but ranged from 18 to 87 years. More than 64% worked more than 5 days/week. Seventy-four percent of them had only primary school education. A number of the health and hazardous working conditions surveyed were significantly different by farm type. Rice farmers were found to have the highest prevalence of allergies, nasal congestion, wheezing, and acute symptoms after pesticide use, while flower farmers had the lowest prevalence of these health outcomes. Rice farmers reported the highest prevalence of hazardous working conditions including high noise levels, working on slippery surfaces, sitting or standing on a vibrating machine, spills of chemicals/pesticides, and sharp injuries. The lowest prevalence of these working conditions (except noise) was reported by flower farmers. Vegetable farmers reported the highest prevalence knee problems, while rice farmers had the lowest prevalence. Among these farmers, more than 27 different types of pesticides were reported in use during the past year, with the majority reporting use once a month. The flower/vegetable farming group reported the highest frequency of good exposure prevention practices during pesticide use. They were the most likely to report using cotton or rubber gloves or a disposable paper masks during insecticide spraying. Those farmers who only grew vegetables had the lowest frequency of good exposure prevention practices, including use of personal protective equipment. The economic cost of work-related injuries and illnesses among informal sector agricultural workers in Thailand is unknown and in need of study. Gaps in the regulations covering pesticide sales allow farmers to purchase pesticides without adequate training in their safe use. Training targeted to farm type regarding safe pesticide use and the prevention of accidents and musculoskeletal disorders is needed. Studies of chronic health effects among Thai farmers are needed, with special emphasis on respiratory, metabolic disease and cancer.