Publication:
A New Measurement of Activities of Daily Living for Thai Elderly with Dementia

dc.contributor.authorVorapun Senanarongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamolthip Harnphadungkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorNaraporn Prayoonwiwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorNiphon Poungvarinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopwan Sivasariyanondsen_US
dc.contributor.authorTipawan Printarakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthipol Udompunthuraken_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey L. Cummingsen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T03:28:49Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T03:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2003-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Activities of daily living (ADL) vary across cultures, and measure of ADL needs to be specific to the population under study. We developed an ADL measure for Thai elderly with dementia and investigated the reliability and validity of this instrument. Materials and Methods: Item construction was accomplished with a panel of neurologists and a rehabilitation medicine physician. One hundred eighty-one subjects were interviewed using the Thai ADL measure. Of this sample, one hundred fifty-nine had dementia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition criteria. These data were analyzed for internal consistency; concurrent validity was determined by comparison with the Barthel Index, Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), Thai Mental State Exam (TMSE), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale; and discriminant validity was determined by comparison with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Thirty subjects were tested to determine interrater and test-retest reliability. Results: Thai ADL measure was composed of six basic ADL and seven instrumental ADL. It had high correlation with TMSE scores (r = -.69), CDR scores (r = .81), Barthel Index scores (r = -.80), and FAQ scores (r = .88), and moderate correlation with NPI scores (r = .46). The instrument had high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .92, .89) and high interrater reliability (ICC = .96, .93). Conclusion: The Thai ADL scale is easy to use and it has high reliability. It had high concurrent validity with previously published ADL scales. The methodology used to develop the Thai ADL scale can provide a model for creating culturally competent ADL scales.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Psychogeriatrics. Vol.15, No.2 (2003), 135-148en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610203008822en_US
dc.identifier.issn10416102en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0242318807en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/21017
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0242318807&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleA New Measurement of Activities of Daily Living for Thai Elderly with Dementiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0242318807&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections