Publication:
Behavioral responses to transfluthrin by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles minimus, Anopheles harrisoni, and Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae)

dc.contributor.authorChutipong Sukkanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirod Nararaken_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael John Bangsen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey Hiien_US
dc.contributor.authorTheeraphap Chareonviriyaphapen_US
dc.contributor.otherHydro Sciences Montpellieren_US
dc.contributor.otherPublic Health and Malaria Control Department, Papuaen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJames Cook University, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T08:58:28Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T08:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAirborne spatial repellency (SR) is characterized and distinguished from other chemical actions including contact locomotor excitation and toxicity. The use of volatile spatial repellents is a potential new intervention class for combatting mosquito-borne pathogen transmission; therefore, continuing investigations on the actions of these chemicals that modify mosquito host-seeking behavior (i.e., bite prevention) is needed. The objective of this study is to characterize the key behavioral avoidance actions of transfluthrin (TFT) to advance spatial repellent development into practical products. Behavioral avoidance responses were observed for adult laboratory strains of Aedes aegypti, Anopheles minimus and An. dirus, and two field populations of An. harrisoni and Ae. aegypti, respectively. Established TFT sublethal (LC50 and LC75), lethal concentrations (LC99) and discriminating concentrations (DCs) were selected corresponding to each mosquito test species. Spatial repellency and contact excitation ('irritancy') responses on adult mosquitoes to TFT were assessed using an excito-repellency assay system. At LC50, TFT exhibited strong avoidance with An. minimus (60.1% escape) and An. dirus (80% escape) laboratory strains, showing between 12 and 16x greater escape response than Ae. aegypti (5% escape). Repellency responses for field collected Ae. aegypti and An. harrisoni were 54.9 and 47.1% escape, respectively. After adjusting the initial contact escape response (a measure of combined irritancy and repellency) to estimate only escape due to contact, the LC50 and LC99 showed moderate escape irritancy with laboratory Ae. aegypti (41.4% escape) and no contact activity against the field population. Adjustment showed only weak contact activity (16.1% escape) in laboratory An. minimus at LC50. Spatial repellency is the predominant mode of action of TFT among colonized and field mosquitoes used in this study. Established baseline (susceptible) dose-response curves assist in optimizing SR products for mosquito control and pathogen transmission prevention.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPloS one. Vol.15, No.8 (2020), e0237353en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0237353en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85089407642en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/57653
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089407642&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleBehavioral responses to transfluthrin by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles minimus, Anopheles harrisoni, and Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089407642&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections