Publication:
Outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated using the thai national protocols

dc.contributor.authorPanya Seksarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurapon Wiangnonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGavivann Veerakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorThirachit Chotsampancharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomjai Kanjanapongkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSu On Chainansamiten_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Regional Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T09:51:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T09:51:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In recent decades, the prognosis for childhood leukemia has improved, especially for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In Thailand, though, the survival rate for ALL is unimpressive. In 2006, standard national protocols for childhood leukemia treatment were implemented. We herein report the outcome of the ALL national protocols and explanations behind discrepancies in outcomes between institutions. Materials and Methods: Between March 2006 and February 2008, 486 children with ALL from 12 institutions were enrolled in the Thai national protocols. There were 3 different protocols based on specific criteria: one each for standard risk, high risk and Burkitt's ALL. We classified participating centers into 4 groups of institutions, namely: medical schools in Bangkok, provincial medical schools, hospitals in Bangkok and provincial hospitals. We also evaluated supportive care, laboratory facilities in participating centers, socioeconomics, and patient compliance. Overall and event-free survival were determined for each group using the Kaplan Meier method. Statistical differences were determined using the log-rank test. Previous outcomes of Thai childhood ALL treatment between 2003 and 2005 served as the historic control. Results: Five-year overall survival of ALL treated using the Thai national protocol was 67.2%; an improvement from the 63.7% of the 12-institute historical control (p-value=0.06). There were discrepancies in event-free survival of ALL between centers in Bangkok and up-country provinces (69.9% vs 51.2%, p-value <0.01). Socioeconomics and patient compliance were key elements in determining the outcome (65.5% vs 47.5%, 59.4% vs 42.9%) (p-value < 0.02). Conclusions: Implementation of standard national protocols for childhood leukemia in Thailand did not significantly improve the outcome of ALL. Factors leading to better outcomes included (a) improvement of treatment compliance (b) prevention of treatment abandonment and (c) financial support to the family.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. Vol.16, No.11 (2015), 4609-4614en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.11.4609en_US
dc.identifier.issn15137368en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84936972892en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35640
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84936972892&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleOutcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated using the thai national protocolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84936972892&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections