Publication: Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device
dc.contributor.author | Jittima Manonai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sakuntala Kamthaworn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kuson Petsarb | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-23T11:00:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-23T11:00:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2015, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Objective: To validate the device and investigate the effect of this device on symptoms, quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle strength. Material and Method: The device was designed to measure vaginal pressure changes using air-pressure balloon and abdominal wall muscle activities using surface electromyography. To test the accuracy of the device, for vaginal pressure measurement, a Mercury sphygmomanometer was used as a gold standard, and for abdominal wall muscle activity, a standard biofeedback machine was used as a reference device. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in sixty-one women with stress urinary incontinence. They were randomly divided into two groups undergoing PFMT with a single 15-minute biofeedback session (BF + PFMT group) or without biofeedback (PFMT group). The pelvic floor muscle strength, abdominal wall muscle activity and incontinence-specific quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL), measurements were evaluated at baseline and at 8- and 16-week after treatment. Results: The accuracy of vaginal probe pressure perineometry was 98% compared to a standard sphygmomanometer. The device could detect abdominal wall muscles activities at 10 milliseconds (100 Hz), 20 milliseconds (50 Hz), and 50 milliseconds (20 Hz). After 8 and 16 weeks of treatment, there were statistically significant intra-group differences in the maximum vaginal squeeze pressure in both groups. However, the inter-group differences were not demonstrated. The proportion of women who performed pelvic floor muscle exercise correctly was significantly higher in the BF + PFMT group (72.41%) compared to the PFMT group (21.88%) at week 16 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The simple pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation device might be helpful in pelvic floor muscle training in a low resource setting. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.98, No.3 (2015), 219-225 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84929509091 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/36734 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929509091&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929509091&origin=inward | en_US |