Publication:
Incidence of acquired lacrimal drainage system obstruction in epiphoric patients in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSuppapong Tirakunwichchaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEhwika Rengwanidchakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomkiat Asawaphureekornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupaporn Tengtrisornen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhanchai Juangphanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitipong Suramethakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokrat Pornpanichen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPhramongkutklao College of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMettapracharak Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T08:48:17Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T08:48:17Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: There were few reports regarding the incidence of the acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction , and the incidence in different geography or countries might be alike. Since the nasolacrimal drainage system obstruction is a common problem in Thailand, knowledge of the incidence may disclose the burden of the disease that has never been reported. Objectives: Evaluate the incidence of acquired lacrimal drainage system obstruction (ALDO) in Thailand. Methods: This study was conducted in multi-centers. It was based on prospective and descriptive design. All patients with epiphoric symptoms visiting the outpatient departments of five tertiary eyecare centers were recruited between 2004 and 2007. Features of epiphoric symptoms and medical history were recorded, and complete ophthalmic examinations were performed. Results: Epiphoric patients were enrolled from all medical centers with 245 eligible patients, female:male ratio was 4.2:1. Ninety-nine patients (40%) had duration of epiphoric symptoms between one-five years. ALDO was found in 111 patients (45%) with female preponderance (6.9:1). Seventy-one patients (64%) had pre-sac obstruction and 40 patients (36%) had post-sac obstruction. Among other causes of epiphora, dry eye was the most common. Conclusion: The most common cause of epiphora was ALDO. The four-year incidence rate of ALDO among epiphoric patients was 45%.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Biomedicine. Vol.4, No.1 (2010), 159-162en_US
dc.identifier.issn19057415en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77957962322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/28798
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957962322&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIncidence of acquired lacrimal drainage system obstruction in epiphoric patients in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957962322&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections