Publication:
Impacts of a sugar sweetened beverage tax on body mass index and obesity in Thailand: A modelling study

dc.contributor.authorPayao Phonsuken_US
dc.contributor.authorVuthiphan Vongmongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuladda Pongutthaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRapeepong Suphanchaimaten_US
dc.contributor.authorNipa Rojroongwasinkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoyd Anthony Swinburnen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Health Policy Program, Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Aucklanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:41:05Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes to address obesity. Thailand has just launched the new tax rates for SSB in 2017; however, the existing tax rate is not as high as the 20% recommended by the WHO. The objective for this study was to estimate the impacts of an SSB tax on body mass index (BMI) and obesity prevalence in Thailand under three different scenarios based on existing SSB and recommended tax rates. Methods A base model was built to estimate the impacts of an SSB tax on SSB consumption, energy intake, BMI, and obesity prevalence. Literature review was conducted to estimate pass on rate, price elasticity, energy compensation, and energy balance to weight change. Different tax rates (11%, 20% and 25%) were used in the model. The model assumed no substitution effects, model values were based on international data since there was no empirical Thai data available. Differential effects by income groups were not estimated. Findings When applying 11%, 20%, and 25% tax rates together with 100% pass on rate and an -1.30 own-price elasticity, the SSB consumption decreased by 14%, 26%, and 32%, respectively. The 20% and 25% price increase in SSB price tended to reduce higher energy intake, weight status and BMI, when compared with an 11% increase in existing price increase of SSB. The percentage changes of obesity prevalence of 11%, 20% and 25% SSB tax rates were estimated to be 1.73%, 3.83%, and 4.91%, respectively. Conclusions A higher SSB tax (20% and 25%) was estimated to reduce consumption and consequently decrease obesity prevalence. Since Thailand has already endorsed the excise tax structure, the new excise tax structure for SSB should be scaled up to a 20% or 25% tax rate if the SSB consumption change does not meet a favourable goal.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.16, No.4 April (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0250841en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85104976270en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/79362
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104976270&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleImpacts of a sugar sweetened beverage tax on body mass index and obesity in Thailand: A modelling studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104976270&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections