Publication:
The diminishing returns of atovaquone-proguanil for elimination of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: modelling mass drug administration and treatment.

dc.contributor.authorMaude, Richard Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorChea Nguonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDondorp, Arjen Men_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Lisa Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Nicholas Jen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Tropical Medicine. Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Uniten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T08:43:47Z
dc.date.available2017-10-24T08:43:47Z
dc.date.created2017-10-24
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artemisinin resistance is a major threat to current efforts to eliminate Plasmodium falciparum malaria which rely heavily on the continuing efficacy of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). It has been suggested that ACT should not be used in mass drug administration (MDA) in areas where artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum is prevalent, and that atovaquone-proguanil (A-P) might be a preferable alternative. However, a single point mutation in the cytochrome b gene confers high level resistance to atovaquone, and such mutant parasites arise frequently during treatment making A-P a vulnerable tool for elimination. Methods: A deterministic, population level, mathematical model was developed based on data from Cambodia to explore the possible effects of large-scale use of A-P compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine ACT for mass drug administration and/or treatment of P. falciparum malaria, with and without adjunctive primaquine (PQ) and long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLIN). The aim was local elimination. Results: The model showed the initial efficacy of ACT and A-P for MDA to be similar. However, each round of A-P MDA resulted in rapid acquisition and spread of atovaquone resistance. Even a single round of MDA could compromise efficacy sufficient to preclude its use for treatment or prophylaxis. A switch to A-P for treatment of symptomatic episodes resulted in a complete loss of efficacy in the population within four to five years of its introduction. The impact of MDA was temporary and a combination of maintained high coverage with ACT treatment for symptomatic individuals and LLIN was necessary for elimination. Conclusion: For malaria elimination, A-P for MDA or treatment of symptomatic cases should be avoided. A combined strategy of high coverage with ACT for treatment of symptomatic episodes, LLIN and ACT + P MDA would be preferable.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. Vol.13, (2014), 380en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/2898
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectMathematicalen_US
dc.subjectModelen_US
dc.subjectFalciparumen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.subjectAtovaquoneen_US
dc.subjectArtemisininen_US
dc.subjectDihydroartemisininen_US
dc.subjectResistanceen_US
dc.titleThe diminishing returns of atovaquone-proguanil for elimination of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: modelling mass drug administration and treatment.en_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
tm-ar-maude-2014-2.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections