Publication: Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis
dc.contributor.author | Andrew J.H. Simpson | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yupin Suputtamongkol | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Michael D. Smith | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brian J. Angus | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Adul Rajanuwong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vanaporn Wuthiekanun | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paul A. Howe | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Amanda L. Walsh | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wipada Chaowagul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nicholas J. White | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Sappasitthiprasong Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Centre for Tropical Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | John Radcliffe Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Musgrove Park Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Malaria Proj./Wellcome Trust Res. L. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-07T09:01:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-07T09:01:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | An open, prospective, randomized, comparative treatment trial was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose intravenous imipenem and ceftazidime for acute severe melioidosis. Adult Thai patients with suspected acute, severe melioidosis were randomized to receive either imipenem, at a dosage of 50 mg/(kg · d), or ceftazidime, at a dosage of 120 mg/(kg · d), for a minimum of 10 days. The main outcome measures were death or treatment failure. Of the 296 patients enrolled, 214 had culture-confirmed melioidosis, and 132 (61.7%) of them had positive blood cultures. Mortality among patients with melioidosis was 36,9% overall. There were no differences in survival overall (P = .96) or after 48 hours (P = .3). Treatment failure after 48 hours was more common among patients treated with ceftazidime (P = .011). Both treatments were well tolerated. Imipenem is a safe and effective treatment for acute severe melioidosis and may be considered an alternative to ceftazidime. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Infectious Diseases. Vol.29, No.2 (1999), 381-387 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/520219 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 10584838 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-0032777243 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/25765 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032777243&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032777243&origin=inward | en_US |