Publication:
Evaluating the performance of automated UV enzymatic assay for screening of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency

dc.contributor.authorPornchai Anantasomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMakamas Chandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWatcharapong Jugnam-angen_US
dc.contributor.authorPirada Witoonpanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoonlarp Cheepsunthornen_US
dc.contributor.authorIssarang Nuchprayoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthat Fucharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChalisa L. Cheepsunthornen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:46:42Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Introduction: A precise and reliable screening assay for glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency would greatly help avoiding unwanted outcomes due to bilirubin neurotoxicity in neonatal jaundice and antimalarial-induced haemolytic anaemia in malaria patients. Currently, available assays are laborious and require sophisticated laboratory expertise. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a recently introduced automated screening assay for G6PD deficiency by comparing with a routine spectrophotometric assay. Methods: An automated UV-based enzymatic (Mindray, PRC) and spectrophotometric assays were performed simultaneously in parallel to determine G6PD activity in 251 blood samples from the subjects. Results: The median G6PD activity value from spectrophotometric assay was significantly lower than that of from the automated assay. The mean difference was −2.0 U/g haemoglobin (−7.3 to 3.2; P < 0.0001). The mean activity values of both assays were strongly correlated with Pearson's correlation coefficient of r = 0.8. Cohen's kappa statistics between assays was 0.77 (0.70-0.83). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the automated assay were 85.7%, 99.2%, 85.7%, 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive values of the automated assay for identifying intermediate G6PD activity levels were 40.0% and 25.0%, respectively. Genotyping was performed to confirm G6PD deficient and intermediate samples. The turnaround time for 40 samples was 60 minutes for the automated assay and 300 minutes for spectrophotometric assay. Conclusion: The automated assay for the detection of G6PD deficiency is comparable to a routine spectrophotometric assay and help reducing sample handling time. However, the assay shows limitation in identifying individuals with G6PD intermediate.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Laboratory Hematology. Vol.41, No.2 (2019), 192-199en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijlh.12943en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751553Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn17515521en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85055936299en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50212
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055936299&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the performance of automated UV enzymatic assay for screening of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiencyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055936299&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections