Publication: Prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection in febrile patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Wanida Mala | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Polrat Wilairatana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Manas Kotepui | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Walailak University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T08:48:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T08:48:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. Methods: Potentially relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection among malaria patients were estimated with the random effect model. The odds of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients were also estimated using a random effect model that presumed the heterogeneity of the outcomes of the included studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger’s test. Results: Of the 1924 studies that were identified from the three databases, 10 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection (182 cases) among febrile patients (16,787 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8–11%, I2: 99.5%) using RDT (IgM), 7% (95% CI: 4–10%) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I2: 41.5%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) using real-time RT-PCR. When the prevalence was stratified by country, the prevalence of co-infection was 7% (95% CI: 5–10%, I2: 99.5%) in Nigeria, 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I2: 99.5%) in Tanzania, 10% (95% CI: 8–11%) in Sierra Leone, 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) in Mozambique, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) in Kenya. The pooled prevalence of CHIKV infection (182 cases) among malaria patients (8317 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 39% (95% CI: 34–44%, I2: 99.7%) using RDT (IgM), 43% (95% CI: 30–57%) using PRNT, 5% (95% CI: 3–7%, I2: 5.18%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 9% (95% CI: 6–15%) using real-time RT-PCR. The meta-analysis showed that malaria and chikungunya co-infection occurred by chance (p: 0.59, OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.6–1.07, I2: 78.5%). Conclusions: The prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection varied from 0% to 10% as per the diagnostic test for CHIKV infection or the country where the co-infection was reported. Hence, the clinicians who diagnose patients with malaria infections in areas where two diseases are endemic should further investigate for chikungunya co-infection to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment of concurrent infection. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. Vol.6, No.3 (2021) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/tropicalmed6030119 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 24146366 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85110557298 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77232 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110557298&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Immunology and Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection in febrile patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110557298&origin=inward | en_US |