Publication: External validation of the s.T.o.n.e. score in predicting stone-free status after rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy
1
Issued Date
2021-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22532447
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85103265446
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Research and Reports in Urology. Vol.13, (2021), 147-154
Suggested Citation
Noppavut Sirirak, Premsant Sangkum, Yada Phengsalae, Wisoot Kongchareonsombat, Charoen Leenanupunth, Wattanachai, Ratanapornsompong, Chinnakhet Ketsuwan External validation of the s.T.o.n.e. score in predicting stone-free status after rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Research and Reports in Urology. Vol.13, (2021), 147-154. doi:10.2147/RRU.S304221 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78782
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
External validation of the s.T.o.n.e. score in predicting stone-free status after rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: The Size, Topography, Obstruction, Number, and Evaluation of Hounsfield units (S.T.O.N.E.) scoring system has been proposed as a novel prognostic surgical classification for urolithiasis in predicting success rate and complications. Objective: We carried out an externally validated S.T.O.N.E. score on rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (rURS). Materials and Methods: The data of patients who had undergone rURS between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary referral center were audited retrospectively. The S.T.O.N.E. score was calculated based on factors determined through preoperative computed tomography images and was analyzed in association with stone-free rate (SFR), operating time, surgical complications, and length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 155 patients were included in the study with a median stone size of 10 mm (7– 12) and a median S.T.O.N.E. score of 9 (8– 10). The overall SFR was 89.68%. SFRs were 100.0%, 97.83%, and 77.42% in low (5), moderate (6– 9), and high (10– 13) score groups, respectively. The S.T.O.N.E. score (p = 0.002) and stone size (p = 0.037) were predictive factors for SFR in multivariate analysis. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the S.T.O.N.E. score and operative time, LOS, and presence of complications (r = 0.22, p = 0.006; r = 0.30, p < 0.001; and r = 0.27, p < 0.001, respectively). The area under the curve of the receiving operator characteristics’ curve for the S.T.O.N.E. score was 0.815. Conclusion: The S.T.O.N.E. scoring system is simple and effective in predicting postoperative outcomes; therefore, this score would be a valuable tool in clinical planning for every patient who undergoes rURS.