Publication:
Long-term Outcomes of Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis, and Efficacy of Amphotericin B and Povidone-Iodine in Infection Prophylaxis

dc.contributor.authorPinnita Prabhasawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuksri Chotikavanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanotsom Ngowyutagonen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarinyupa Pinitpuwadolen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:01:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes, anatomic retention, and complications of Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro). Design: Retrospective, interventional case series Methods: A retrospective chart review of implantations performed January 2008–December 2017 was conducted. Risk factors for anatomical retention and functional success were analyzed. The incidences of infections with and without antimicrobial medications were compared. Results: Twenty-seven eyes of 26 patients were recruited. The most common indication for KPro surgery was failed penetrating keratoplasties (22 eyes, 81.5%). All patients had preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 3/60. Over the mean follow-up of 83.4 ± 28.4 months, 15 eyes (55.6%) demonstrated improved BCVA. The anatomical retention rate was 88.9%, and the functional success rate was 44.4% (retained KPro with BCVA ≥ 3/60). Eyes with ocular surface disease (OSD) had significantly more complications than those without OSD. The most common complications were retroprosthetic membrane formation (15 eyes, 55.6%) and infection (13 eyes, 48.1%). Infectious keratitis was primarily caused by gram-positive bacteria, whereas endophthalmitis was chiefly caused by fungal infection. The infection incidence was significantly lower in eyes using topical 0.1% amphotericin B and 5% povidone iodine (P =.008 and.021, respectively). Conclusions: With its good retention rate and visual outcomes, Boston type I KPro could be an alternative treatment for patients with conventional penetrating keratoplasty failure, especially with appropriate patient selection and complication prevention. Standard prophylactic antibiotics with the addition of topical 0.1% amphotericin B and 5% povidone iodine might be optional effective regimens for infection prevention, especially in tropical countries.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology. Vol.232, (2021), 40-48en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.022en_US
dc.identifier.issn18791891en_US
dc.identifier.issn00029394en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85116121471en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77517
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116121471&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleLong-term Outcomes of Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis, and Efficacy of Amphotericin B and Povidone-Iodine in Infection Prophylaxisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116121471&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections