Publication:
Population structure and population history of Anopheles dirus mosquitoes in Southeast Asia

dc.contributor.authorCatherine Waltonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJane M. Handleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilloughby Tun-Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank H. Collinsen_US
dc.contributor.authorRalph E. Harbachen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisut Baimaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRoger K. Butlinen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Leedsen_US
dc.contributor.otherMinistry of Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenters for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Natural History Museum, Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:07:22Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:07:22Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSeparating the confounding effects of long-term population history from gene flow can be difficult. Here, we address the question of what inferences about gene flow can be made from mitochondrial sequence data in three closely related species of mosquitoes, Anopheles dirus species A, C, and D, from Southeast Asia. A total of 84 sequences of 923 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene were obtained from 14 populations in Thailand, Myanmar, and Bangladesh. The genealogy of sequences obtained from two populations of An. dirus C indicates no contemporary gene flow between them. The F(ST) value of 0.421 therefore probably represents a recent common history, perhaps involving colonization events. Anopheles dirus A and D are parapatric, yet no differentiation was seen either within or between species. The starlike genealogy of their haplotypes, smooth unimodal mismatch distributions, and excess of low frequency mutations indicate population expansion in An. dirus A and D. This, rather than widespread gene flow, explains their low within-species F(ST) values (0.018 and 0.022). The greater genetic diversity of An. dirus D suggests that expansion occurred first in species D arid subsequently in species A. The current geographical separation and low hybrid fitness of these species also argue against ongoing interspecific gene flow. They suggest instead either historical introgression of mtDNA from An. dirus D into species A followed by independent range expansions, or a selective sweep of mtDNA that originated in An. dirus D. While not excluding contemporary gene flow, historical population processes are sufficient to explain the data in An. dirus A and D. The genealogical relationships between haplotypes could not be used to make inferences of gene flow because of extensive homoplasy due to hypervariable sites and possibly also recombination. However, it is concluded that this approach, rather than the use of fixation indices, is required in the future to understand contemporary gene flow in these mosquitoes. The implications of these results for understanding gene flow in another important and comparable group of malaria vector mosquitoes in Africa, the An. gambiae complex, are also discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Biology and Evolution. Vol.17, No.6 (2000), 962-974en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026377en_US
dc.identifier.issn07374038en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0034079161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/25832
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034079161&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titlePopulation structure and population history of Anopheles dirus mosquitoes in Southeast Asiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034079161&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections