Publication:
Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorSupa Pengpiden_US
dc.contributor.authorPeltzer, Karlen_US
dc.contributor.authorApa Puckpinyoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Viripiromgoolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKriengsak Thamma-aphipholen_US
dc.contributor.authorKawinarat Suthisukhonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDussanee Dumeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorThiprada Kongtapanen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. ASEAN Institute for Health Developmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-17T08:06:15Z
dc.date.available2017-11-17T08:06:15Z
dc.date.created2017-11-17
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. Method: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and alcohol moderate risk in four hospitals were randomized into 2 control and 1 intervention condition using the hospital as a unit of randomization (2 intervention and 2 control hospitals) to 405 patients in the two control groups (tobacco only intervention, n = 199, and alcohol only intervention, n = 206) and 215 in the intervention group. The intervention or control consisted of three counselling sessions. Results: Results of the interaction (Group × Time) effects using GEE indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the three study groups over the 6-month follow-up on the ASSIST tobacco score (Wald χ2 = 8.43, P = 0.004), and past week tobacco use abstinence (Wald χ2 = 7.34, P = 0.007). Although there were no significant interaction effects on the other outcomes (Alcohol ASSIST score, low alcohol risk score, past week tobacco abstinence or low alcohol risk score, and past week tobacco abstinence and low alcohol risk score), the scores in all of the six outcome measures showed consistent improvements. For past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention. For the outcome of low alcohol risk, the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention was more effective than the tobacco only or alcohol only intervention. Conclusions: The study found that for past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the polydrug use (alcohol and tobacco) integrated intervention.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. Vol.10, (2015), 22en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/3202
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectConjoint alcohol and tobacco useen_US
dc.subjectBrief interventionen_US
dc.subjectModerate risken_US
dc.subjectTobacco use alcohol useen_US
dc.subjectHospital out-patientsen_US
dc.subjectThailanden_US
dc.titleScreening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeResearchen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ad-ar-peltzer-2015-1.pdf
Size:
437.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections