Publication: Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles identifies differential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Issued Date
2016-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14230380
10104283
10104283
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84979265000
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Tumor Biology. Vol.37, No.9 (2016), 12755-12766
Suggested Citation
Somsak Likhitrattanapisal, Jaitip Tipanee, Tavan Janvilisri Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles identifies differential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Tumor Biology. Vol.37, No.9 (2016), 12755-12766. doi:10.1007/s13277-016-5186-8 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42937
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles identifies differential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2016, International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are the members of hepatobiliary diseases. Both types of cancer often exert high levels of similarity in terms of phenotypic characteristics, thus leading to difficulties in HCC and CCA differential diagnoses. In this study, a transcriptome meta-analysis was performed on HCC and CCA microarray data to identify differential transcriptome networks and potential biomarkers for HCC and CCA. Raw data from nine gene expression profiling datasets, consisting of 1,185 samples in total, were methodologically compiled and analyzed. To evaluate differentially expressed (DE) genes in HCC and CCA, the levels of gene expression were compared between cancer and its normal counterparts (i.e., HCC versus normal liver and CCA versus normal bile duct) using t test (P < 0.05) and k-fold validation. A total of 226 DE genes were specific to HCC, 249 DE genes specific to CCA, and 41 DE genes in both HCC and CCA. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses revealed different patterns between functional transcriptome networks of HCC and CCA. Cell cycle and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways were exclusively dysregulated in HCC whereas complement and coagulation cascades as well as glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism were prodominantly differentially expressed in CCA. Our meta-analysis revealed distinct dysregulation in transcriptome networks between HCC and CCA. Certain genes in these networks were discussed in the context of HCC and CCA transition, unique characteristics of HCC and CCA, and their potentials as HCC and CCA differential biomarkers.