Publication: Implications of current therapeutic restrictions for primaquine and tafenoquine in the radical cure of vivax malaria
Issued Date
2018-04-20
Resource Type
ISSN
19352735
19352727
19352727
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85046340522
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.12, No.4 (2018)
Suggested Citation
James Watson, Walter R.J. Taylor, Germana Bancone, Cindy S. Chu, Podjanee Jittamala, Nicholas J. White Implications of current therapeutic restrictions for primaquine and tafenoquine in the radical cure of vivax malaria. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.12, No.4 (2018). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006440 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46750
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Implications of current therapeutic restrictions for primaquine and tafenoquine in the radical cure of vivax malaria
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 Watson et al. Background: The 8-aminoquinoline antimalarials, the only drugs which prevent relapse of vivax and ovale malaria (radical cure), cause dose-dependent oxidant haemolysis in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Patients with <30% and <70% of normal G6PD activity are not given standard regimens of primaquine and tafenoquine, respectively. Both drugs are currently considered contraindicated in pregnant and lactating women. Methods: Quantitative G6PD enzyme activity data from 5198 individuals were used to estimate the proportions of heterozygous females who would be ineligible for treatment at the 30% and 70% activity thresholds, and the relationship with the severity of the deficiency. This was used to construct a simple model relating allele frequency in males to the potential population coverage of tafenoquine and primaquine under current prescribing restrictions. Findings: Independent of G6PD deficiency, the current pregnancy and lactation restrictions will exclude ~13% of females from radical cure treatment. This could be reduced to ~4% if 8-aminoquinolines can be prescribed to women breast-feeding infants older than 1 month. At a 30% activity threshold, approximately 8–19% of G6PD heterozygous women are ineligible for primaquine treatment; at a 70% threshold, 50–70% of heterozygous women and approximately 5% of G6PD wild type individuals are ineligible for tafenoquine treatment. Thus, overall in areas where the G6PDd allele frequency is >10% more than 15% of men and more than 25% of women would be unable to receive tafenoquine. In vivax malaria infected patients these proportions will be lowered by any protective effect against P. vivax conferred by G6PD deficiency. Conclusion: If tafenoquine is deployed for radical cure, primaquine will still be needed to obtain high population coverage. Better radical cure antimalarial regimens are needed.