Publication:
Habitat and landscape factors influence pollinators in a tropical megacity, Bangkok, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorAlyssa B. Stewarten_US
dc.contributor.authorTuanjit Sritongchuayen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyakarn Teartisupen_US
dc.contributor.authorSakonwan Kaewsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSara Bumrungsrien_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherXishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:22:17Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Stewart et al. Background: Pollinators are well known for the ecosystem services they provide, and while urban areas are generally perceived as low-quality habitat for most wildlife, these cities often support a surprising degree of pollinator diversity. The current rapid growth of urban areas and concern over global pollinator declines have spurred numerous studies examining pollinator communities in temperate cities, but knowledge about tropical urban pollinators remains scarce. Methods: This study investigated the effects of habitat and landscape factors on pollinator richness and abundance in a highly-populated, tropical city: Bangkok, Thailand. We conducted pollinator observations in 52 green areas throughout the city and collected data on patch size, floral abundance, plant richness, location type, and percent vegetation at five spatial scales. Results: Of the 18,793 pollinators observed, over 98% were bees. Both patch size and floral abundance generally had positive effects on pollinators, although there was a significant interaction between the two factors; these findings were generally consistent across all focal taxa (Tetragonula stingless bees, Apis honey bees, Xylocopa carpenter bees, and butterflies). Discussion: Our results demonstrate the importance of maintaining large green areas in cities, since small green areas supported few pollinators, even when floral resources were abundant. Moreover, most pollinator taxa utilized a variety of location types (e.g., public parks, school campuses, temple grounds), with the exception of butterflies, which preferred parks. Our findings are generally consistent with those of temperate urban studies, but additional studies in the tropics are needed before global patterns can be assessed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeerJ. Vol.2018, No.7 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.5335en_US
dc.identifier.issn21678359en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85050299365en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/44902
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050299365&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleHabitat and landscape factors influence pollinators in a tropical megacity, Bangkok, Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050299365&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections