Publication:
National feasibility survey of peritoneal dialysis key performance indicators in Thailand from provider perspective

dc.contributor.authorKrit Pongpirulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTalerngsak Kanjanabuchen_US
dc.contributor.authorPongpratch Puapatanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyatida Chuengsamanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhongsak Dandechaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPornchai Kingwatanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchai Sritippayawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnutra Chittinandanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Eiam-Ongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKriengsak Vareesangthipen_US
dc.contributor.authorKriang Tungsangaen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBhumibol Adulyadej Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherBanphaeo Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-02T04:54:10Z
dc.date.available2020-06-02T04:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been the main method of renal replacement therapy under the “PD First” policy in Thailand since 2008. Initially, the proposed 13 key performance indicators (KPIs) raised feasibility concerns because of inequitable distribution of resources such as laboratory facilities and/or specialized health-care staff for PD care throughout the country. Methods: Data availability and goals from the health-care providers' perspective were explored using an online questionnaire survey for all PD centers registered with the Nephrology Society of Thailand from May to June 2016. The availability of essential data required for each KPI indicator to achieve the desired target was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Of the 197 centers, 119 responded to the survey (response rate of 60.41%). PD indicators with a high percentage of strongly disagree or disagree were “PD adequacy measured in the last 12 months” (26.83%), “Total weekly Kt/V ≥ 1.7” (24.59%), “3-year PD technique survival” (21.31%), “Serum parathyroid levels within 150 to 500 pg/mL” (16.94%), and a “3-year PD patient survival” (19.01%). As many as 34.17%, 39.19%, 27.27%, 28.93%, and 22.00%, respectively, did not anticipate that the targets could be achieved. Based on the findings from this survey, the national committee concluded that these indicators be removed, and only eight PD indicators were launched. Conclusion: Given the importance of KPIs for quality assurance and financial reimbursement, inputs from health-care providers especially data availability and achievement of targets should be considered to ensure feasibility before the final list of indicators are launched.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNephrology. Vol.25, No.6 (2020), 483-490en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nep.13668en_US
dc.identifier.issn14401797en_US
dc.identifier.issn13205358en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074079415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/56233
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074079415&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNational feasibility survey of peritoneal dialysis key performance indicators in Thailand from provider perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074079415&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections