Publication:
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization in siriraj hospital, a matched case-control study

dc.contributor.authorRoungsin Choavaratanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhornphan Phalangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsin Petyimen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorazalina Saaden_US
dc.contributor.authorIsarin Thanaboonyawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJaparath Prechapanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitak Laokirkkiaten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiti Putra Malaysiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:11:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:11:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Objective: To compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes between singletons born after IVF and natural conception. Methods: A total of 141 singleton pregnancies conceived by IVF were included. Another 141 singleton pregnancies conceived naturally were randomly selected as comparison group, matched by age. Data were retrospectively extracted from medical records, including baseline characteristics and delivery data. Various characteristics, including pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Women in IVF group were more likely to be nulliparous and had previous miscarriage (88.7% vs. 76.6%, 0=0.003; and 26.2% vs. 14.8%, p=0.018, respectively). Underlying diseases and complications during pregnancy were comparable between the 2 groups. Mean gestational age was lower in IVF group (37.9 ± 2.0 vs. 38.4 ± 1.6, p=0.008), but without clinical significance. Primary cesarean section was significantly more common among women in IVF group (74.4% vs. 54.6%, p<0.001) and the majority were elective cases (61.9% vs. 23.4%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of rates of preterm labor, birth weight, low birth weight, small for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and perinatal mortality. Conclusion: Singleton pregnancies after IVF were not associated with higher risks of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes, compared with naturally conceived group, but IVF pregnancies are associated with a high rate of cesarean sections.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.70, No.3 (2018), 233-237en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14456/smj.2018.38en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85051599011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46707
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051599011&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleObstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization in siriraj hospital, a matched case-control studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051599011&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections