Publication: A simple scoring system to differentiate between relapse and re-infection in patients with recurrent melioidosis
3
item.page.dc.date.issued
2008-07-01
item.page.dc.type
item.page.dc.identifier.doi
item.page.dc.identifier.other
2-s2.0-56149098131
item.page.dc.rights
Mahidol University
item.page.dc.rights.holder
SCOPUS
item.page.dc.identifier.citation
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.2, No.10 (2008)
punsarn.item.page.citation
Direk Limmathurotsakul, Wipada Chaowagul, Narisara Chantratita, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Mayurachat Biaklang, Sarinna Tumapa, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P J Day, Sharon J. Peacock A simple scoring system to differentiate between relapse and re-infection in patients with recurrent melioidosis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.2, No.10 (2008). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000327 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/19621
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
relationships.isThesisOf
item.page.dc.title
A simple scoring system to differentiate between relapse and re-infection in patients with recurrent melioidosis
item.page.dc.contributor.other
item.page.dc.description.abstract
Background: Melioidosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in East Asia. Recurrent melioidosis occurs in around 10% of patienst following treatment either because of relapse with the same strain or re-infection with a new strain of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Distinguishing between the two is important but requires bacterial genotyping. The aim of this study was to develop a simple scoring system to distinguish re-infection from relapse. Methods: In a prospective study of 2,804 consecutive adult patients with melioidosis presenting to Sappasithiprasong Hospital, NE Thailand, between 1986 and 2005, there were 141 patients with recurrent melioidosis with paired strains available for genotyping. Of these, 92 patients had relapse and 49 patients had re-infection. Variables associated with relapse or re-infection were identified by multivariable logistic regression and used to develop a predective model. Performance of the scoring system was quantified with respect to disrimanation (area under receiver operating characteristic curves, AUC) and categorization (graphically). Boostrap resampling was used to internally validate the predictors and adjust for over-optimism. Findings: Duration of oral antimicrobial treatment, interval between the primary episode and recurrence, season, and renal function at recurrence were independent predictors of relapse or re-infection. A score <5 correctly identified relapse in 76 of 89 patients (85%), whereas a score ≥5 correctly identified re-infection in 36 of 52 patients (69%). The scoring index had good discriminative power, with a bootstrap bias-corrected AUC of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.73-0.87). Conclusions: A simple scoring index to predict the cause of recurrent melioidosis has been developed to provide important bedside information where rapid bacterial genotyping is unavailable. © 2008 Limmathurotsakul et al.