Publication:
Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among the university staff

dc.contributor.authorSanthanee Khruakhornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaskorn Sritipsukhoen_US
dc.contributor.authorYongyuth Siripakarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoongtiwa Vachalathitien_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T09:21:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T07:24:15Z
dc.date.available2014-01-28T09:21:56Z
dc.date.available2018-03-23T07:24:15Z
dc.date.created2014-01-28
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the population especially in working population. Many intrinsic and extrinsic factors have been evaluatedfor associatedfactorfor LBP. Epidemiological researches have been provided information on the prevalence and riskfactors of LBP in the workers. Little information has related individual and work-relatedfactors to the prevalence of LBP among the university staff in Thailand. Aim: The author aims to investigate the prevalence of LBP and explore risk factors of LBP among university staff in the government sector. Material and Method: The self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 1,183 university staff on the list by official messenger Data were collected over three months between October and December 2008. The questionnaire included low back pain information, demographic data, work-related characteristics, and habitual physical activity level. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression techniques. The 6-month prevalence and associated risk factors were presented. Results: Eight hundred and three staff returned the questionnaires (response rale of 6 7.9%). The past 6-month prevalence of self-reported LBP was 22.3% (95% CI: 19.4-25.2). The result ofmultivariate analysis showed that habitual physical activity level were found to be independent factors associated with the LBP (p-value = 0.048 by LRT) after adjusted for gender, nutritional level and work activity in a day. The physical activity as athletic level appeared to be the protective effect when compared to sedentary level (adjustedOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.94). Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, the physical activity as athletic level appears to be associated with the 6-month prevalence of LBP Consequently, it is important that prevention programs take into account this risk factor in order to reduce the frequency of low back injuries in university staff and improve their work efficiency.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.93, No.7 (2010), 142-148en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125-2208
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/10356
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderMedical Association of Thailanden_US
dc.subjectLow back painen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectAssociated riskfactorsen_US
dc.subjectUniversity staff
dc.titlePrevalence and risk factors of low back pain among the university staffen_US
dc.title.alternativeความชุกและปัจจัยเสี่ยงของกลุ่มอาการปวดหลังส่วนล่างในบุคลากรมหาวิทยาลัยen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections