Publication:
The Immediate Effects of Mobilization Technique on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients Presenting With Unilateral Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorRotsalai Kanlayanaphotpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdit Chiradejnanten_US
dc.contributor.authorRoongtiwa Vachalathitien_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T06:39:16Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T06:39:16Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractKanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Objective: To determine the immediate effects on both pain and active range of motion (ROM) of the unilateral posteroanterior (PA) mobilization technique on the painful side in mechanical neck pain patients presenting with unilateral symptoms. Design: Triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy, institutional clinic. Participants: Patients (N=60), 2 physical therapists, and 1 assessor involved in this study. Interventions: The patients were randomly allocated into either preferred or random mobilization group by using an opaque concealed envelope. The first therapist performed the screening, assessing, prescribing the spinal level(s), and the grade of mobilization. The second therapist performed the mobilization treatment according to their allocated group stated in an envelope. The assessor who was blind to the group allocation conducted the measurements of pain and active cervical ROM. Main Outcome Measures: Pain intensity, active cervical ROM, and global perceived effect were measured at baseline and 5 minutes posttreatment. Results: After mobilization, there were no apparent differences in pain and active cervical ROM between groups. However, within-group changes showed significant decreases in neck pain at rest and pain on most painful movement (P<0.001) with a significant increase in active cervical ROM after mobilization on most painful movement (P=0.002). Conclusions: The results of this study did not provide support for the preference of the unilateral PA mobilization on the painful side to the random mobilization. © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Vol.90, No.2 (2009), 187-192en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.017en_US
dc.identifier.issn00039993en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-60349112478en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/27601
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=60349112478&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe Immediate Effects of Mobilization Technique on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients Presenting With Unilateral Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=60349112478&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections