Publication:
The efficacy of honey and a Thai Herbal Oil preparation in the treatment of pressure ulcers based on Thai traditional medicine wound diagnosis versus standard practice: An open-label randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorSomtanuek Chotchoungchatchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorOrapitchaya Krairiten_US
dc.contributor.authorPramote Tragulpiankiten_US
dc.contributor.authorSompop Prathanturarugen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T05:12:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T05:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors Background: Scientific support for Thai traditional medicine (TTM) practice is warranted for reintroduction into modern healthcare systems. A promising TTM practice for treatment of pressure ulcers was selected to conduct a clinical trial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the TTM practice for the treatment of pressure ulcers using honey or a Thai Herbal Oil preparation (THO) based on the TTM wound diagnosis comparing with the standard practice. Methods: The study design was an open-label randomized controlled trial. Sixty-six participants, with pressure ulcers at least stage II-IV or unstageable, were allocated to two groups via minimization. A TTM practice group received honey or THO depending on the TTM diagnosis via the Thai Traditional Medicine Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool (TTM-PUAT). A standard practice group received advanced dressings, including hydrogel, alginate, silver-impregnated, or hydrocolloid dressings. The primary outcome was the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). Results: Both TTM practice and standard practice showed a significant reduction in PUSH scores after treatments. However, there was no significant difference in PUSH score reduction between the groups. The mean PUSH score reduction over the 6-week period was 2.58 ± 3.38 (95% CI 1.34–3.82) in the TTM practice group and 3.24 ± 3.49 (95% CI 1.91–4.57) in the standard practice group (p = 0.284). The TTM practice and standard practice accelerated pressure ulcer healing without statistically significant difference between the practices, during 6 weeks in a home-based care setting. This finding supported the TTM practice as an alternative treatment for pressure ulcer.en_US
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Clinical Trials Communications. Vol.17, (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100538en_US
dc.identifier.issn24518654en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078912261en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53903
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078912261&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy of honey and a Thai Herbal Oil preparation in the treatment of pressure ulcers based on Thai traditional medicine wound diagnosis versus standard practice: An open-label randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078912261&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections